- Groq has exactly 0 dollars in revenue - Groq requires 576 chips to run a single model - Groq can do low latency inference, but can't handle batches, and can't run a diversity of different models on each deployment -…
Groq quantize their models, killing accuracy. SambaNova run the models at full precision, and on a single node, whilst Groq runs a single model on hundreds of chips. SambaNova run training and inference, Groq only run…
Let me know how that goes.
SambaNova is the only one if the chip startups that is viable. It surprises me that people don’t see this.
Groq makes zero revenue, needs hundreds on chips to run 1 model, and runs everything at lower precision. SambaNova has a lot of revenue, and runs at that speed at full precision on a single node. It really isn’t a…
How are they lagging? They are running faster than anyone else at full precision and with many many fewer chips than Groq. Groq is not real.
- Groq has exactly 0 dollars in revenue - Groq requires 576 chips to run a single model - Groq can do low latency inference, but can't handle batches, and can't run a diversity of different models on each deployment -…
Groq quantize their models, killing accuracy. SambaNova run the models at full precision, and on a single node, whilst Groq runs a single model on hundreds of chips. SambaNova run training and inference, Groq only run…
Let me know how that goes.
SambaNova is the only one if the chip startups that is viable. It surprises me that people don’t see this.
Groq makes zero revenue, needs hundreds on chips to run 1 model, and runs everything at lower precision. SambaNova has a lot of revenue, and runs at that speed at full precision on a single node. It really isn’t a…
How are they lagging? They are running faster than anyone else at full precision and with many many fewer chips than Groq. Groq is not real.