This is not confusing
The impressive part is that it is low latency enough to serve high quality answers at game speed through the model instead of a pre generated ad-hoc machine.
"can't hallucinate" feels like some word game Olympics
Presumably you have no social media then?
This is not typical
Exceedingly unlikely
The alternative now is the damage not being fixed and there being no ramifications/punishment
> current frontier models need laborious oversight and guardrails on even the simplest task As models advance, we shift the goalpost for what "simplest task" means. Before, "simplest task " meant "write a coherent…
> Two agents will almost never hallucinate in the same way, regardless of their weights Citation needed
That's because they're massively wealthy and have teams of lawyers, not because of AI
This is the AI equivalent of a guy selling you a course. If it worked, it would be more profitable for them to use it than to sell it.
You don't "need" to. It just achieved a culinary effect
"ability to play chess" and "ability to beat current best-in-class chess algorithms" are technically not the same thing. The second can be achieved by cheating. The first cannot.
Don't have a competitor for Astra -> we need to slow down
Right and society only works on one thing at a time
Nobody is going to tell you you can't carve your own spoons, smith your own shoes for your horses, and grow your own wheat for your own bread. Just don't blame the people who care more about eating bread than scything…
No, you're just seeing what it looks like when more people are able to make games. It's not the AI that is bad, it's the person who's not putting a lot of work in that's bad. It's just camera phones.
Absolutely not. People just lack imagination in how to use new tools in the pursuit of Eros
This means you don't enjoy making games, you enjoy coding
You don't know what AI means
You're just bad at using LLMs
It's actually a valid extension of your metaphor that introduces nuance that substantially weakens your point
No, it's like ordering a meal from door dash and saying "I got food." Using a tool does not mean you didn't do the thing you used the tool to do. You're conflating "I made X" with "I personally did every part of X with…
"You didn't build that house, your hammer did"
Using LLMs to write code is only boring if you're only trying to make the same boring things you were capable of doing when writing it by hand.
This is not confusing
The impressive part is that it is low latency enough to serve high quality answers at game speed through the model instead of a pre generated ad-hoc machine.
"can't hallucinate" feels like some word game Olympics
Presumably you have no social media then?
This is not typical
Exceedingly unlikely
The alternative now is the damage not being fixed and there being no ramifications/punishment
> current frontier models need laborious oversight and guardrails on even the simplest task As models advance, we shift the goalpost for what "simplest task" means. Before, "simplest task " meant "write a coherent…
> Two agents will almost never hallucinate in the same way, regardless of their weights Citation needed
That's because they're massively wealthy and have teams of lawyers, not because of AI
This is the AI equivalent of a guy selling you a course. If it worked, it would be more profitable for them to use it than to sell it.
You don't "need" to. It just achieved a culinary effect
"ability to play chess" and "ability to beat current best-in-class chess algorithms" are technically not the same thing. The second can be achieved by cheating. The first cannot.
Don't have a competitor for Astra -> we need to slow down
Right and society only works on one thing at a time
Nobody is going to tell you you can't carve your own spoons, smith your own shoes for your horses, and grow your own wheat for your own bread. Just don't blame the people who care more about eating bread than scything…
No, you're just seeing what it looks like when more people are able to make games. It's not the AI that is bad, it's the person who's not putting a lot of work in that's bad. It's just camera phones.
Absolutely not. People just lack imagination in how to use new tools in the pursuit of Eros
This means you don't enjoy making games, you enjoy coding
You don't know what AI means
You're just bad at using LLMs
It's actually a valid extension of your metaphor that introduces nuance that substantially weakens your point
No, it's like ordering a meal from door dash and saying "I got food." Using a tool does not mean you didn't do the thing you used the tool to do. You're conflating "I made X" with "I personally did every part of X with…
"You didn't build that house, your hammer did"
Using LLMs to write code is only boring if you're only trying to make the same boring things you were capable of doing when writing it by hand.