That's not the service Google or Apple have ever offered Parler.
Hmm, http://neverssl.com/ seems to work for me.
The website is still accessible, right?
Apple doesn’t censor Safari.
Hitler’s words matter for the sake of history but I don’t have to sell them in my book store.
The mainstream media refuses to take them seriously? Fox News’ ad revenues beg to differ.
They have absolutely not wanted to ban him since day 1. He brings in millions of users and clicks.
And that's fine! It doesn't depend on that core network. Make your own. That's what open source is for!
Mastodon exists.
All, Signal is a 501c3 nonprofit. Your company probably matches donations. If they don't, they are eligible to be added to your company's portal. I encourage you to throw some of your wealth their way and take the extra…
I'm sure it is faster to use your hand. But I'm not sure faster is the right metric. Safety is probably higher on my list, and I'd say voice commands are safer than taking your hand off the wheel for any reason.
Yes, it’s brought out as a negative because those companies are actively using that data to influence your behavior and serve you ads. Apple does not do this.
Out of curiosity, did you ever try the voice commands in the Tesla? I'm used to these systems being garbage, but Tesla's is quite good. I've moved to using it entirely while driving, even using auto-pilot.
I enjoyed Simple for their amazing app, but in the end found that the 1 or 2 times a year I sold something for cash on Craigslist meant I always needed a branch. So I gave up and moved to a credit union.
There is a middle ground between taking your ball and going home and playing by the new rules without complaint. Adding another app — my vote goes to Signal - and making a lot of noise on WhatsApp is one option. If I…
Note that "indefinitely" here doesn't mean they haven't considered when to bring him back: "Therefore, we are extending the block we have placed on his Facebook and Instagram accounts indefinitely and for at least the…
The information you put in parenthesis immediately rules it out for 99% of users. I can count on one hand the number of my family members who have any concept for what that information means.
This is some mafia shit. They're holding users data hostage behind a click-through acceptance of their altered terms. You can either pray they don't alter the deal further, or get the fuck out, abandoning your chat…
As of 2017, you can file court documents using WeChat. https://www.scmp.com/tech/china-tech/article/2125804/tencent...
This will still get caught up in litigation, won't be backed by the Biden administration, and won't be funded by any of the big banks, which have refused to participate [0]…
Your point still stands, but a better comparison I think is cash on hand, since valuation doesn’t mean much in terms of paying fines. You can’t pay the government in stock. LYV had $2.6b on hand last quarter.
Conspiracy mongering? No. The article contends there is no conspiracy here, only the possibility of an accident that, projected through the lens politics, has become too toxic to discuss out in the open. Time will tell.
“We also use suppliers such as social media companies and search engines in order to advertise the launch of our Services. We may share your email address or device ID with these suppliers.” I will not get this card…
Right, it seems like the point isn’t “Targeted ads don’t work,” it’s “There are ways to fake ad targeting that fooled a major company.” Uber could benefit from legitimate ad targeting (assuming they haven’t hit market…
Should not developers then be expected to generate a certain return for Apple in terms of sales, or risk being removed from the store?
That's not the service Google or Apple have ever offered Parler.
Hmm, http://neverssl.com/ seems to work for me.
The website is still accessible, right?
Apple doesn’t censor Safari.
Hitler’s words matter for the sake of history but I don’t have to sell them in my book store.
The mainstream media refuses to take them seriously? Fox News’ ad revenues beg to differ.
They have absolutely not wanted to ban him since day 1. He brings in millions of users and clicks.
And that's fine! It doesn't depend on that core network. Make your own. That's what open source is for!
Mastodon exists.
All, Signal is a 501c3 nonprofit. Your company probably matches donations. If they don't, they are eligible to be added to your company's portal. I encourage you to throw some of your wealth their way and take the extra…
I'm sure it is faster to use your hand. But I'm not sure faster is the right metric. Safety is probably higher on my list, and I'd say voice commands are safer than taking your hand off the wheel for any reason.
Yes, it’s brought out as a negative because those companies are actively using that data to influence your behavior and serve you ads. Apple does not do this.
Out of curiosity, did you ever try the voice commands in the Tesla? I'm used to these systems being garbage, but Tesla's is quite good. I've moved to using it entirely while driving, even using auto-pilot.
I enjoyed Simple for their amazing app, but in the end found that the 1 or 2 times a year I sold something for cash on Craigslist meant I always needed a branch. So I gave up and moved to a credit union.
There is a middle ground between taking your ball and going home and playing by the new rules without complaint. Adding another app — my vote goes to Signal - and making a lot of noise on WhatsApp is one option. If I…
Note that "indefinitely" here doesn't mean they haven't considered when to bring him back: "Therefore, we are extending the block we have placed on his Facebook and Instagram accounts indefinitely and for at least the…
The information you put in parenthesis immediately rules it out for 99% of users. I can count on one hand the number of my family members who have any concept for what that information means.
This is some mafia shit. They're holding users data hostage behind a click-through acceptance of their altered terms. You can either pray they don't alter the deal further, or get the fuck out, abandoning your chat…
As of 2017, you can file court documents using WeChat. https://www.scmp.com/tech/china-tech/article/2125804/tencent...
This will still get caught up in litigation, won't be backed by the Biden administration, and won't be funded by any of the big banks, which have refused to participate [0]…
Your point still stands, but a better comparison I think is cash on hand, since valuation doesn’t mean much in terms of paying fines. You can’t pay the government in stock. LYV had $2.6b on hand last quarter.
Conspiracy mongering? No. The article contends there is no conspiracy here, only the possibility of an accident that, projected through the lens politics, has become too toxic to discuss out in the open. Time will tell.
“We also use suppliers such as social media companies and search engines in order to advertise the launch of our Services. We may share your email address or device ID with these suppliers.” I will not get this card…
Right, it seems like the point isn’t “Targeted ads don’t work,” it’s “There are ways to fake ad targeting that fooled a major company.” Uber could benefit from legitimate ad targeting (assuming they haven’t hit market…
Should not developers then be expected to generate a certain return for Apple in terms of sales, or risk being removed from the store?