Naivete and scorn of autism in one short sentence - you're very efficient. Yandex.com is the international front end to yandex, and not a portal for 'a handful of western autists'. But on Russia's granular propaganda…
Declining to follow a blunderer into a blundered war really isn't a "decision to live with high oil prices" rather common-sense. This is the USA's mess.
This sounds like all engineering, rather than just AI. The greatest effort given to the last small difficult details, often for results that seem trifling but which matter at scale. But it's a poor argument. The code…
> Goodness me. Sit and think about that for a while. You're quite right, let's think further about this. - A person racing to meet their deadlines. - Another sweating through a difficult meeting. - A third using some…
> I am saying he is, to me, evidently mentally ill in the way I feel I have been mentally ill. I wouldn't accept a doctor telling me my problems are work stress. I'd find it far less acceptable if a doctor told me work…
Before AI, did you find that the existence of human expertise in the world far surpassing yours 'automated your thinking and cognition' or limited your intellectual scope to inventing party-tricks? I've always found…
I agree with you and I'm nitpicking, but if you play a GM, you more than likely are playing Stockfish until your opponent's out of book.
This is total bollocks. The skeptics are all present and just as forceful in any AI thread.
One man's cliche is another man's hacker news comment
Your cynicism is blinding you to impressive feats that don't have precedents. You don't have any evidence for that cynicism, except the cynicism itself. Meanwhile performances like these aren't faked:…
China's robots are not Tesla's.
> But Orwell's rule 4 should be ignored ... Orwell himself routinely ignores it, even in the first sentence of the essay Orwell can answer you himself if you read just a little further: > vi. Break any of these rules…
Remember he's transcribing a scripture into bad modern prose, instead of riffing on it.
My view doesn't need tempering. I talked about progress, which is indisputable, whatever the speed of its pace or current limitations might be. And that was the entire point: robotics is not a stagnant field. Amazing I…
This is the 'Not today, so never" fallacy. As capabilities in all fields are stagnant and human progress stands still. I would switch off the 'nam flicks and check out some of the recent Chinese robotics progress before…
> This shows a deep misunderstanding of the paper's claims, which in no way challenge the established view that these bots are next-token predictors. No, this shows an appreciation of the symbolic richness behind that…
Reading stuff like this (as a layman), diminishing these things as 'Next token predictors' seems absurdly reductive. At some point we'll need to concede that 'selection' is a better term for this than prediction.
The gaps aren't toss-ups. For instance a recent poll on rejoining the EU: https://yougov.com/en-gb/articles/54567-how-strong-is-uk-sup... > Support: 55% Opposition: 34%
> I have a mixed bag of UK friends, and it's about half-half. Polls show the population regrets Brexit. [1] > One thing I think myself is that there was an ugly _hope_ that the UK would suffer as a result. A hope which,…
Any excuse to kill something, eh? Tell me, in the free market where a competitor was eating into your paycheck, or threatening the fast food supply to your children, would you head over to their HQ packing heat?
How dare their need to feed spoil a lawn's appearance...
Believe it or not, it's quite straightforward to get laid (abundantly) and find a mate (and a chain of replacements) in the suburbs, too. But your ordering works well for remote thinly populated areas. Looking for a…
You're making a conceptual mistake here, comparing a chess tool to its operator. Deterministic tools produce superior results compared to models in many areas, so we allow models to use tooling. The correct analogy here…
> Although I partially applaud what Anna's Archive is doing, I like their model the least (they want to CHARGE to download while doing Copyright infringement?). This is bollocks. AA gives users a means of paying to…
> It would be if it made the point you think it is. All of this is more and more hand waving. 75 copies in museums? Then I think we’re good. You're repeating the seller's contextual point, as if it's a counterargument.…
Naivete and scorn of autism in one short sentence - you're very efficient. Yandex.com is the international front end to yandex, and not a portal for 'a handful of western autists'. But on Russia's granular propaganda…
Declining to follow a blunderer into a blundered war really isn't a "decision to live with high oil prices" rather common-sense. This is the USA's mess.
This sounds like all engineering, rather than just AI. The greatest effort given to the last small difficult details, often for results that seem trifling but which matter at scale. But it's a poor argument. The code…
> Goodness me. Sit and think about that for a while. You're quite right, let's think further about this. - A person racing to meet their deadlines. - Another sweating through a difficult meeting. - A third using some…
> I am saying he is, to me, evidently mentally ill in the way I feel I have been mentally ill. I wouldn't accept a doctor telling me my problems are work stress. I'd find it far less acceptable if a doctor told me work…
Before AI, did you find that the existence of human expertise in the world far surpassing yours 'automated your thinking and cognition' or limited your intellectual scope to inventing party-tricks? I've always found…
I agree with you and I'm nitpicking, but if you play a GM, you more than likely are playing Stockfish until your opponent's out of book.
This is total bollocks. The skeptics are all present and just as forceful in any AI thread.
One man's cliche is another man's hacker news comment
Your cynicism is blinding you to impressive feats that don't have precedents. You don't have any evidence for that cynicism, except the cynicism itself. Meanwhile performances like these aren't faked:…
China's robots are not Tesla's.
> But Orwell's rule 4 should be ignored ... Orwell himself routinely ignores it, even in the first sentence of the essay Orwell can answer you himself if you read just a little further: > vi. Break any of these rules…
Remember he's transcribing a scripture into bad modern prose, instead of riffing on it.
My view doesn't need tempering. I talked about progress, which is indisputable, whatever the speed of its pace or current limitations might be. And that was the entire point: robotics is not a stagnant field. Amazing I…
This is the 'Not today, so never" fallacy. As capabilities in all fields are stagnant and human progress stands still. I would switch off the 'nam flicks and check out some of the recent Chinese robotics progress before…
> This shows a deep misunderstanding of the paper's claims, which in no way challenge the established view that these bots are next-token predictors. No, this shows an appreciation of the symbolic richness behind that…
Reading stuff like this (as a layman), diminishing these things as 'Next token predictors' seems absurdly reductive. At some point we'll need to concede that 'selection' is a better term for this than prediction.
The gaps aren't toss-ups. For instance a recent poll on rejoining the EU: https://yougov.com/en-gb/articles/54567-how-strong-is-uk-sup... > Support: 55% Opposition: 34%
> I have a mixed bag of UK friends, and it's about half-half. Polls show the population regrets Brexit. [1] > One thing I think myself is that there was an ugly _hope_ that the UK would suffer as a result. A hope which,…
Any excuse to kill something, eh? Tell me, in the free market where a competitor was eating into your paycheck, or threatening the fast food supply to your children, would you head over to their HQ packing heat?
How dare their need to feed spoil a lawn's appearance...
Believe it or not, it's quite straightforward to get laid (abundantly) and find a mate (and a chain of replacements) in the suburbs, too. But your ordering works well for remote thinly populated areas. Looking for a…
You're making a conceptual mistake here, comparing a chess tool to its operator. Deterministic tools produce superior results compared to models in many areas, so we allow models to use tooling. The correct analogy here…
> Although I partially applaud what Anna's Archive is doing, I like their model the least (they want to CHARGE to download while doing Copyright infringement?). This is bollocks. AA gives users a means of paying to…
> It would be if it made the point you think it is. All of this is more and more hand waving. 75 copies in museums? Then I think we’re good. You're repeating the seller's contextual point, as if it's a counterargument.…