lmao pathetic
I'm sorry, but no, you don't get to lecture me about my privilege when I'm responding a grotesque coddled techbro pontificating about how Doordash has solved the problem of eating to the point that cooking is some…
> Just like people still use typewriters, make their own clothes, or cook themselves dinner etc. One of these things is not like the others. Your silicon valley bubble privilege is showing.
This is almost certainly the case. I very much doubt that anyone there of any importance in the decision-making process around this actually cares about the math, just the headlines they can get from pushing it out.
What a disingenuous, willfully ignorant take. None of these AI companies have been acting in good faith or in any way other than grotesque self-aggrandizement to the expense of everyone else.
This proof dump reminds me of the glut of low-quality drive-by PRs overwhelming open-source repos.
By all accounts the "dangerous for math" claims seem to be primarily around flooding the field with complicated impossible-to-understand proofs that according to recent research may or may not be correct depending on…
Also a ton of comments in this thread: breathless frothing hype declaring mathematics is over and assuming these proofs are exactly what they claim they are at face value, giving the company with a vested interest in…
I agree with this too and I find this article extremely depressing. The AI "revolution" as described here is the wholesale outsourcing of vast swaths of thinking and decision-making to a single entity. A project coded…
"Those who gained experience with the old tech were essentially AI models trained on statistically good probabilities of getting good shot" I am so glad I am not you. What a miserable way to live your life.
I don't buy this analogy and I think it takes a depressingly reductive view of creativity. In both cases, the photographers had to take the time to go to a place, see a view they thought was worth capturing, operated…
Correction: OpenAI carried out an attack on RubyGems. I am gobsmacked at the tech industry's seemly bottomless appetite for giving these clowns the benefit of the doubt.
Are posts like that really DIY? They're more like increasingly elaborate and convoluted ways of getting something else to do it for you
I don't understand the point of this. If they wanted to make a Python interpreter, why didn't they just ask an AI to do it?
lmao pathetic
I'm sorry, but no, you don't get to lecture me about my privilege when I'm responding a grotesque coddled techbro pontificating about how Doordash has solved the problem of eating to the point that cooking is some…
> Just like people still use typewriters, make their own clothes, or cook themselves dinner etc. One of these things is not like the others. Your silicon valley bubble privilege is showing.
This is almost certainly the case. I very much doubt that anyone there of any importance in the decision-making process around this actually cares about the math, just the headlines they can get from pushing it out.
What a disingenuous, willfully ignorant take. None of these AI companies have been acting in good faith or in any way other than grotesque self-aggrandizement to the expense of everyone else.
This proof dump reminds me of the glut of low-quality drive-by PRs overwhelming open-source repos.
By all accounts the "dangerous for math" claims seem to be primarily around flooding the field with complicated impossible-to-understand proofs that according to recent research may or may not be correct depending on…
Also a ton of comments in this thread: breathless frothing hype declaring mathematics is over and assuming these proofs are exactly what they claim they are at face value, giving the company with a vested interest in…
I agree with this too and I find this article extremely depressing. The AI "revolution" as described here is the wholesale outsourcing of vast swaths of thinking and decision-making to a single entity. A project coded…
"Those who gained experience with the old tech were essentially AI models trained on statistically good probabilities of getting good shot" I am so glad I am not you. What a miserable way to live your life.
I don't buy this analogy and I think it takes a depressingly reductive view of creativity. In both cases, the photographers had to take the time to go to a place, see a view they thought was worth capturing, operated…
Correction: OpenAI carried out an attack on RubyGems. I am gobsmacked at the tech industry's seemly bottomless appetite for giving these clowns the benefit of the doubt.
Are posts like that really DIY? They're more like increasingly elaborate and convoluted ways of getting something else to do it for you
I don't understand the point of this. If they wanted to make a Python interpreter, why didn't they just ask an AI to do it?