No, it's not a strong indicator that the process is random or worthless. That makes the assumption that the people rejected by the process would have scored just as well. It could be very good at determining who has the…
A few very bad assumptions there: 1) not all employees have CS degrees from the US, many are foreign 2) the graduation rate by "race" or "gender" in 2015 is not what is was in 2005, 1995, 1985 or 1975, and the any…
No, it's not a strong indicator that the process is random or worthless. That makes the assumption that the people rejected by the process would have scored just as well. It could be very good at determining who has the…
A few very bad assumptions there: 1) not all employees have CS degrees from the US, many are foreign 2) the graduation rate by "race" or "gender" in 2015 is not what is was in 2005, 1995, 1985 or 1975, and the any…