I read your comment and I picture a sort of information balkanization via endless whack-a-mole of privacy tech and organizational surveillance. It may just be how it will ever be.
"We are working on documenting these security tradeoffs in detail in our whitepaper (and any attempt I make to describe them here will be less accurate and thereby dangerous ;P)." Maybe a whitelist of nodes themselves?…
Is there any thought given to the response to a node operator who is detected/proven to be operating the node for surveillance or compromise? What would the response be? Will tokens not be sold to such a node operator?
I read your comment and I picture a sort of information balkanization via endless whack-a-mole of privacy tech and organizational surveillance. It may just be how it will ever be.
"We are working on documenting these security tradeoffs in detail in our whitepaper (and any attempt I make to describe them here will be less accurate and thereby dangerous ;P)." Maybe a whitelist of nodes themselves?…
Is there any thought given to the response to a node operator who is detected/proven to be operating the node for surveillance or compromise? What would the response be? Will tokens not be sold to such a node operator?