Just say the whole internet is not for kids without adult supervision and leave it at that. It doesn't even matter if you can get something that technically works. Half the "age appropriate" content targeted at children…
How about just "Don't allow advertising period"?
Why is doing a task with a machine suddenly objectionable when the same task performed by humans is perfectly fine?
That is really good point. The court is basically giving them permission to do this, by asking them to not have net neutrality.
They can't fine starlink if they have no presence in their country. They already did those other things and people are still using starlink systems in their countries. There is no other recourse for them.
Starlink can see the packet traffic. They ought be able to analyze which dishes are on each side of the conflict. Even if it isn't perfectly accurate, a rough blacklist would help Ukraine tremendously (by hurting…
I am not belittling them. Just recognizing the fact they have no power to enforce anything on starlink. It's not about what they "deserve". It is about what is physically possible. I would love it if pirate internet via…
What is an African country going to do about enforcing anything to do with starlink other than confiscate hardware within their borders? Whine to the UN that someone is competing with their local telecom?
You must have read a different article, because "starlink doesn't like it" is the only justification or explanation the article offers for their stance. And that is neither a valid justification nor an explanation.
Then it is up to the local government to confiscate their starlink hardware. There is no reason for starlink to respect every single legal jurisdiction's rules. They only need to deal with wherever they connect to ISPs.
Why do you think the consent of someone relaying information matters in the slightest when it comes to what people do with that information?
You can also reduce your attack surface (dependencies).
I would say that is unfair because their actual platform is deliberately sabotaging any kind of functional governance and refusing to change any government policy that is clearly broken and in desperate need of change.…
Is it mostly spam that makes you think moderation is necessary or is it something else? I ask because I have some ideas about how to implement a moderation-less reddit-alike. (I think I know how to eliminate spam)
In order for there to be a victim, the deep fake needs to be distributed and passed off as real. Creation alone harms exactly nobody.
Ineffective and barely enforced.
To clarify, I am only talking about direct financial benefit (capitalist ownership). But it has to be backdated to the owners at the time range when wrongdoing occurred. That way you can go after people who sold (for…
The people benefiting from any behavior ranging from deceptive to criminal should be at least partially held liable (at minimum to not receive any profit whatsoever from those misdeeds). Will this change investor…
These fines should just be paid by shareholders (backdated to whoever profited from their misdeeds)
I am not aware of any laws in the US about selling books that are only text (no pictures) to minors. The only "banned books" lists apply to school libraries/librarians. I cannot possibly see what the justification would…
There is no requirement to make money to have a successful open source project. That being said. Monetizing open source is fine so long as people are up front about from the beginning. People are upset because switching…
Does it matter if you intended to do something nefarious all along, or if you just now saw an opportunity to be nefarious? All that matters is that you are doing something nefarious.
You don't have to be 18 to read smutty literature.
No more limits to financial liability. That is the legal solution. Nothing is going to get fixed until there are real consequences for the people with the power to fix things.
Sounds like a problem with Rust. Not a problem with async/await.
Just say the whole internet is not for kids without adult supervision and leave it at that. It doesn't even matter if you can get something that technically works. Half the "age appropriate" content targeted at children…
How about just "Don't allow advertising period"?
Why is doing a task with a machine suddenly objectionable when the same task performed by humans is perfectly fine?
That is really good point. The court is basically giving them permission to do this, by asking them to not have net neutrality.
They can't fine starlink if they have no presence in their country. They already did those other things and people are still using starlink systems in their countries. There is no other recourse for them.
Starlink can see the packet traffic. They ought be able to analyze which dishes are on each side of the conflict. Even if it isn't perfectly accurate, a rough blacklist would help Ukraine tremendously (by hurting…
I am not belittling them. Just recognizing the fact they have no power to enforce anything on starlink. It's not about what they "deserve". It is about what is physically possible. I would love it if pirate internet via…
What is an African country going to do about enforcing anything to do with starlink other than confiscate hardware within their borders? Whine to the UN that someone is competing with their local telecom?
You must have read a different article, because "starlink doesn't like it" is the only justification or explanation the article offers for their stance. And that is neither a valid justification nor an explanation.
Then it is up to the local government to confiscate their starlink hardware. There is no reason for starlink to respect every single legal jurisdiction's rules. They only need to deal with wherever they connect to ISPs.
Why do you think the consent of someone relaying information matters in the slightest when it comes to what people do with that information?
You can also reduce your attack surface (dependencies).
I would say that is unfair because their actual platform is deliberately sabotaging any kind of functional governance and refusing to change any government policy that is clearly broken and in desperate need of change.…
Is it mostly spam that makes you think moderation is necessary or is it something else? I ask because I have some ideas about how to implement a moderation-less reddit-alike. (I think I know how to eliminate spam)
In order for there to be a victim, the deep fake needs to be distributed and passed off as real. Creation alone harms exactly nobody.
Ineffective and barely enforced.
To clarify, I am only talking about direct financial benefit (capitalist ownership). But it has to be backdated to the owners at the time range when wrongdoing occurred. That way you can go after people who sold (for…
The people benefiting from any behavior ranging from deceptive to criminal should be at least partially held liable (at minimum to not receive any profit whatsoever from those misdeeds). Will this change investor…
These fines should just be paid by shareholders (backdated to whoever profited from their misdeeds)
I am not aware of any laws in the US about selling books that are only text (no pictures) to minors. The only "banned books" lists apply to school libraries/librarians. I cannot possibly see what the justification would…
There is no requirement to make money to have a successful open source project. That being said. Monetizing open source is fine so long as people are up front about from the beginning. People are upset because switching…
Does it matter if you intended to do something nefarious all along, or if you just now saw an opportunity to be nefarious? All that matters is that you are doing something nefarious.
You don't have to be 18 to read smutty literature.
No more limits to financial liability. That is the legal solution. Nothing is going to get fixed until there are real consequences for the people with the power to fix things.
Sounds like a problem with Rust. Not a problem with async/await.