Speak for yourself haha. Unconscious and unexamined behaviors hardly constitute a value system.
I love graphics like this. Very nice aesthetic choices.
Yes.
You can either have a conversation free of contradictions or a conversation about the truth,, can't have it both ways!
Being mindful is sage advice. But equating some repetitive task with meditation is the same as equating riding a bicycle with deep REM sleep.
All the things you describe can be meditative after one has experienced a meaningful glimpse. But the only way to initially get such a meaningful glimpse is through seated meditation.
Rather casuistic take, there.
Copyright law was updated in a very helpful way in the last twenty years sometime so that as soon as you post something to the internet you have copyright. If you need a citation don't hesitate to ask someone else.
Isn't "which one is watermarked?" a different question than "which one is better?" "Which diamonds are shinier, the blood diamond sourced ones or the ethically sourced ones?" ... that's not the same question as "which…
Very intelligent people need intelligent-others to bounce ideas off of, and the LLM can be that.
What's gonna be a real trip, is when you can tell which LLM produced it by the subtle pattern recognition you'll have developed to catch the watermarks
Reminds me of Austin Powers: 21! Blackjack, "Hit me!" "...but Austin!" "I also like to live, dangerously."
Yes, classically the Point of meditation is to enter into absorption via gathering-poise [not a common term but one I have begun using as of late as a sense-for-sense translation of samadhi]. Unfabricated reality is not…
I do really appreciate tranquil posts about immersing oneself in actual life, like this one. But as a long-term meditator I have a duty to inform everyone that doing something is not meditation.
it's The Economist. What used to be a stellar publication is not any longer, since they are superfluously economical on both details and calories-required-to-comprehend an article.
There are many ways to be wrong, but only a few ways to be right. LLMs need to optimize for short-term objectives as the currently do, AND ethics-aligned outcomes. Mechanically, the EAOS ethics-aligned outcome score…
lol "Why Go is really good - an article by Google"
Did you know that the training data that trained all the LLMs was, once upon a time, entirely and painstakingly tagged by real live humans? Why would ethics scenarios be any different?
1) cite your sources 2) not impossible. imperfect maybe, but if I ask you should you buy a plane ticket or kidnap the pilot's wife and demand a free ride, which do you think gets a higher score? 3) Again, with all this…
Saying something is challenging to measure is one thing - throwing the measurement dimension away entirely because of a platitude is another. You're suggesting that it's impossible to do perfectly, but I disagree with…
Ahimsa
EAOS shouldn't be “the ethics score we optimize.” It should be “an independently evaluated safety/acceptability constraint that can veto an otherwise successful trajectory.” That gives you a three-layer picture: Task…
Yesterday I came up with an idea that I sent to some researchers at the different AI labs via email: Rather than train the model on one score, track two scores. The first score is the Short-term-objective-score (STOS)…
that sort of rearrangement makes sense. and the likely downstream effect is the OS can ... do less [at higher levels of userspace]
So freakin' cool. Overjoyed by your efforts here. I notice when I search for certain different words like "brahmavihara" or just "vihara" sometimes I get different results due to slight differences in the titles of…
Speak for yourself haha. Unconscious and unexamined behaviors hardly constitute a value system.
I love graphics like this. Very nice aesthetic choices.
Yes.
You can either have a conversation free of contradictions or a conversation about the truth,, can't have it both ways!
Being mindful is sage advice. But equating some repetitive task with meditation is the same as equating riding a bicycle with deep REM sleep.
All the things you describe can be meditative after one has experienced a meaningful glimpse. But the only way to initially get such a meaningful glimpse is through seated meditation.
Rather casuistic take, there.
Copyright law was updated in a very helpful way in the last twenty years sometime so that as soon as you post something to the internet you have copyright. If you need a citation don't hesitate to ask someone else.
Isn't "which one is watermarked?" a different question than "which one is better?" "Which diamonds are shinier, the blood diamond sourced ones or the ethically sourced ones?" ... that's not the same question as "which…
Very intelligent people need intelligent-others to bounce ideas off of, and the LLM can be that.
What's gonna be a real trip, is when you can tell which LLM produced it by the subtle pattern recognition you'll have developed to catch the watermarks
Reminds me of Austin Powers: 21! Blackjack, "Hit me!" "...but Austin!" "I also like to live, dangerously."
Yes, classically the Point of meditation is to enter into absorption via gathering-poise [not a common term but one I have begun using as of late as a sense-for-sense translation of samadhi]. Unfabricated reality is not…
I do really appreciate tranquil posts about immersing oneself in actual life, like this one. But as a long-term meditator I have a duty to inform everyone that doing something is not meditation.
it's The Economist. What used to be a stellar publication is not any longer, since they are superfluously economical on both details and calories-required-to-comprehend an article.
There are many ways to be wrong, but only a few ways to be right. LLMs need to optimize for short-term objectives as the currently do, AND ethics-aligned outcomes. Mechanically, the EAOS ethics-aligned outcome score…
lol "Why Go is really good - an article by Google"
Did you know that the training data that trained all the LLMs was, once upon a time, entirely and painstakingly tagged by real live humans? Why would ethics scenarios be any different?
1) cite your sources 2) not impossible. imperfect maybe, but if I ask you should you buy a plane ticket or kidnap the pilot's wife and demand a free ride, which do you think gets a higher score? 3) Again, with all this…
Saying something is challenging to measure is one thing - throwing the measurement dimension away entirely because of a platitude is another. You're suggesting that it's impossible to do perfectly, but I disagree with…
Ahimsa
EAOS shouldn't be “the ethics score we optimize.” It should be “an independently evaluated safety/acceptability constraint that can veto an otherwise successful trajectory.” That gives you a three-layer picture: Task…
Yesterday I came up with an idea that I sent to some researchers at the different AI labs via email: Rather than train the model on one score, track two scores. The first score is the Short-term-objective-score (STOS)…
that sort of rearrangement makes sense. and the likely downstream effect is the OS can ... do less [at higher levels of userspace]
So freakin' cool. Overjoyed by your efforts here. I notice when I search for certain different words like "brahmavihara" or just "vihara" sometimes I get different results due to slight differences in the titles of…