Just make sure that you're staying within safe listening levels as to not damage your hearing.
Re: credibility---as for my realm the same can be said about Blake Richards.
Great question, and sorry for not being clear. It's not the frequency tuning of a given outer hair cell (OHC) that that changes, it is their response to the sound level (what I meant by dynamic range). OHCs are…
Yes, essentially! One key difference is that frequency and intensity coding in the cochlea is facilitated by a a built-in active physiological component (outer hair cells) that enhances frequency selectivity and…
I once had the idea of a "subscription to pizza" wherein a pizza would arrive at your door every friday night without prompt. Though to some degree I maintain it is a good idea, Pizza ATM may trump it.
Maybe bargl means Bioelectric Impedance Analysis? A cursory internet search also indicates BIA is suspect as a one-time measure.
In reading the paper, I appreciate the statistical efforts to adjust for age differences between the groups to make their claim, but at least optically it doesn't help that the average age of each cohort was already 10…
Just make sure that you're staying within safe listening levels as to not damage your hearing.
Re: credibility---as for my realm the same can be said about Blake Richards.
Great question, and sorry for not being clear. It's not the frequency tuning of a given outer hair cell (OHC) that that changes, it is their response to the sound level (what I meant by dynamic range). OHCs are…
Yes, essentially! One key difference is that frequency and intensity coding in the cochlea is facilitated by a a built-in active physiological component (outer hair cells) that enhances frequency selectivity and…
I once had the idea of a "subscription to pizza" wherein a pizza would arrive at your door every friday night without prompt. Though to some degree I maintain it is a good idea, Pizza ATM may trump it.
Maybe bargl means Bioelectric Impedance Analysis? A cursory internet search also indicates BIA is suspect as a one-time measure.
In reading the paper, I appreciate the statistical efforts to adjust for age differences between the groups to make their claim, but at least optically it doesn't help that the average age of each cohort was already 10…