What do you mean and? The implications are implicit; any vulnerability will be unpatched, so bad actor (tm) has to know only ONE vulnerability after XP support was ceased. If he has means of talking to the machine…
I wrote a small test bench for my own uses as wanted to compare with different codecs and see how "raw compression" would work, how would QOI+ZSTD combination work and so on. Here's example output.. image: 1502 x 1800 (…
Guilty as charged.. the 1% was a napkin estimate. The True Cost in this specific case is (0..7 bits to fill a byte) + 2 bytes for the RST marker for each interval. 320x240 image and RST interval for each 240/8 block…
Found the file. 230 ms decode and 96 ms encode on i9 7900x. :)
Timings with the original test image ( https://www.eso.org/public/archives/print_posters/large/prin... ) 9933 x 7016 (7.4 MB) load turbojpeg: 309 ms load mango: 225 ms save turbojpeg: 388 ms save mango: 96 ms Started…
https://github.com/t0rakka/mango
What do you mean and? The implications are implicit; any vulnerability will be unpatched, so bad actor (tm) has to know only ONE vulnerability after XP support was ceased. If he has means of talking to the machine…
I wrote a small test bench for my own uses as wanted to compare with different codecs and see how "raw compression" would work, how would QOI+ZSTD combination work and so on. Here's example output.. image: 1502 x 1800 (…
Guilty as charged.. the 1% was a napkin estimate. The True Cost in this specific case is (0..7 bits to fill a byte) + 2 bytes for the RST marker for each interval. 320x240 image and RST interval for each 240/8 block…
Found the file. 230 ms decode and 96 ms encode on i9 7900x. :)
Timings with the original test image ( https://www.eso.org/public/archives/print_posters/large/prin... ) 9933 x 7016 (7.4 MB) load turbojpeg: 309 ms load mango: 225 ms save turbojpeg: 388 ms save mango: 96 ms Started…
https://github.com/t0rakka/mango