So long as our society rights wrongs reactively I see no problem with this. A society righting wrongs proactively will never run out of wrongs to right.
Sorry that happened to you. What you've said is true - your brother should not have hit you in the first place. Apples and oranges, though. Physical violence, threats, and calls to action must not be equated to…
It is possible for both things to be true at once: * For women to have strength & agency * For external circumstances & socialization to have impacts on individuals But what I don't understand is how you can maintain…
>No, the effects of deliberate, targeted differences in socialization by gender aren't the fault of the people experiencing adverse impacts because of the intersection of those with social structures that respond better…
Perhaps the ability to corrupt symbols by association shouldn't be given to groups that haven't committed heinous acts?
So long as our society rights wrongs reactively I see no problem with this. A society righting wrongs proactively will never run out of wrongs to right.
Sorry that happened to you. What you've said is true - your brother should not have hit you in the first place. Apples and oranges, though. Physical violence, threats, and calls to action must not be equated to…
It is possible for both things to be true at once: * For women to have strength & agency * For external circumstances & socialization to have impacts on individuals But what I don't understand is how you can maintain…
>No, the effects of deliberate, targeted differences in socialization by gender aren't the fault of the people experiencing adverse impacts because of the intersection of those with social structures that respond better…
Perhaps the ability to corrupt symbols by association shouldn't be given to groups that haven't committed heinous acts?