[dead]
Not any descriptive name at all, but any name only partially descriptive, where the omitted information leads to confusion. The fully descriptive name should be "MS implementation of the MVC pattern for the ASP.NET…
If I call my new shiny operating system Unix OS, am I good? It's Unix, it's an OS, and just like ASP.NET MVC, I am descriptive, am I not?
I did read it, and I don't see where it is clearly stated or implied that only Terence Tao is ignorant, or that cancer medicine is common knowledge. So, what did I miss?
It has found its way in many Linux distros as a replacement for bash scripts when the implementation becomes just too convoluted. It's a boring syntax (though with few semantic quirks), intuitive to understand and hack,…
MVC is still a general way of structuring code. Would it be the only way a MVC framework could or should be implemented for ASP.NET?
The point is: most people don't have an understanding of cancer medicine. Does the content of the article invalidate this argument?
> Terrence Tao does not understand cancer medicine As opposed to?
> looks like average slop. How can you tell?
web service?
[dead]
Not any descriptive name at all, but any name only partially descriptive, where the omitted information leads to confusion. The fully descriptive name should be "MS implementation of the MVC pattern for the ASP.NET…
If I call my new shiny operating system Unix OS, am I good? It's Unix, it's an OS, and just like ASP.NET MVC, I am descriptive, am I not?
I did read it, and I don't see where it is clearly stated or implied that only Terence Tao is ignorant, or that cancer medicine is common knowledge. So, what did I miss?
It has found its way in many Linux distros as a replacement for bash scripts when the implementation becomes just too convoluted. It's a boring syntax (though with few semantic quirks), intuitive to understand and hack,…
MVC is still a general way of structuring code. Would it be the only way a MVC framework could or should be implemented for ASP.NET?
The point is: most people don't have an understanding of cancer medicine. Does the content of the article invalidate this argument?
> Terrence Tao does not understand cancer medicine As opposed to?
> looks like average slop. How can you tell?
web service?
[dead]