Is that the real reason? Isn't it more that it just didn't get enough traction? MATLAB has cashed in and they don't have a free version. Octave isn't eating their lunch. And it's not like the C/C++ guys made a ton of…
What exactly is annoying? I always want my variable names to be as long and descriptive as possible. We're no longer in the teletype era and our monitors are huge. With autocomplete there is no reason to keep variable…
Having Getters for each member variable always seems fine and reasonable. It's when you have getters that do "magic" that I feel a little.. unsure. Like if it's taking a member and returning it in a different unit that…
What? Businesses that try to to use the libraries they create would have to pay royalties... how is that charity?
I haven't really seen this done but couldn't Google pour money in to developing very high quality GPL'd libraries for say.. C++ or Python - becoming the defacto standard libraries. If other's want to use them in their…
Is that the real reason? Isn't it more that it just didn't get enough traction? MATLAB has cashed in and they don't have a free version. Octave isn't eating their lunch. And it's not like the C/C++ guys made a ton of…
What exactly is annoying? I always want my variable names to be as long and descriptive as possible. We're no longer in the teletype era and our monitors are huge. With autocomplete there is no reason to keep variable…
Having Getters for each member variable always seems fine and reasonable. It's when you have getters that do "magic" that I feel a little.. unsure. Like if it's taking a member and returning it in a different unit that…
What? Businesses that try to to use the libraries they create would have to pay royalties... how is that charity?
I haven't really seen this done but couldn't Google pour money in to developing very high quality GPL'd libraries for say.. C++ or Python - becoming the defacto standard libraries. If other's want to use them in their…