It's a nice respite from regulatory bodies reassuring people with fidget spinners and memes.
Deleting insidious social media accounts (Facebook for example) half a decade ago when it became clear which way the wind was blowing. I seriously doubt I would be as happy, or even alive, it I hadn't.
If you don't need to touch shaders, then you're doing something trivial, like drawing models with a camera. Once you dip your toes into even something like alpha transparency, or z fighting, depth buffer precision, or…
I would actually just recommend diving into THREE.js. It's truly one of the best documented and most "obvious" codebases out there. If all you've got is a solid understanding of JS, you can just start hacking up…
No, he would not. As mentioned in the article he was reputedly celibate by choice for this reason.
The person checking out the book is a program, so they aren't the brightest. They check out the book called "how to go to facebook.com". Then they check out "how to type a password". Then they check out "Typing '1234'…
Can you elaborate where in the wild you found it?
If the yardstick for Mozilla's mission is how fast they can make a browser, why do we need Mozilla? There are arguably better equipped entities doing that. Their whole mission is to have better judgement and management,…
The key word is "just". That's not a misconception I share. I understand Mozilla can and should make money to further its mission. But unlike a for-profit, making money isn't the mission of Mozilla. So needing to make…
I agree. I merely challenge the notion that a nonprofit -- which proudly tumpets its benevolence and non-profitness -- should get a free pass for covertly installing advertising arrangements, just because they need to…
> Mozilla's gotta make money somehow They're a nonprofit; they're not allowed to just "make money". And, they already take donations.
It's a nice respite from regulatory bodies reassuring people with fidget spinners and memes.
Deleting insidious social media accounts (Facebook for example) half a decade ago when it became clear which way the wind was blowing. I seriously doubt I would be as happy, or even alive, it I hadn't.
If you don't need to touch shaders, then you're doing something trivial, like drawing models with a camera. Once you dip your toes into even something like alpha transparency, or z fighting, depth buffer precision, or…
I would actually just recommend diving into THREE.js. It's truly one of the best documented and most "obvious" codebases out there. If all you've got is a solid understanding of JS, you can just start hacking up…
No, he would not. As mentioned in the article he was reputedly celibate by choice for this reason.
The person checking out the book is a program, so they aren't the brightest. They check out the book called "how to go to facebook.com". Then they check out "how to type a password". Then they check out "Typing '1234'…
Can you elaborate where in the wild you found it?
If the yardstick for Mozilla's mission is how fast they can make a browser, why do we need Mozilla? There are arguably better equipped entities doing that. Their whole mission is to have better judgement and management,…
The key word is "just". That's not a misconception I share. I understand Mozilla can and should make money to further its mission. But unlike a for-profit, making money isn't the mission of Mozilla. So needing to make…
I agree. I merely challenge the notion that a nonprofit -- which proudly tumpets its benevolence and non-profitness -- should get a free pass for covertly installing advertising arrangements, just because they need to…
> Mozilla's gotta make money somehow They're a nonprofit; they're not allowed to just "make money". And, they already take donations.