So like, resting?
Here's the original indictment: https://www.theregister.com/2021/12/02/nickolas_sharp_ubiqui...
It’s almost as though by allowing for this natural behavior, randomness gets more extreme (aims towards extremities). Wondering if there are ways this model collapses - for example, if any jump from one bar to the next…
Ohhhhh, thank you! That makes sense. It seems there was an implicit assumption of 95% (p<0.05), is that right?
Lower than general population or lower than the control group?
Yup, everyone publishes their public keys. No one’s private keys gets published (fake crush created). I’m not sure if zero-knowledge proofs exist for love outside of action - repeated acts of commitment over time (to…
So like, resting?
Here's the original indictment: https://www.theregister.com/2021/12/02/nickolas_sharp_ubiqui...
It’s almost as though by allowing for this natural behavior, randomness gets more extreme (aims towards extremities). Wondering if there are ways this model collapses - for example, if any jump from one bar to the next…
Ohhhhh, thank you! That makes sense. It seems there was an implicit assumption of 95% (p<0.05), is that right?
Lower than general population or lower than the control group?
Yup, everyone publishes their public keys. No one’s private keys gets published (fake crush created). I’m not sure if zero-knowledge proofs exist for love outside of action - repeated acts of commitment over time (to…