That's a poor option to regulate from. They could just as easily have required messaging apps to make their protocols open, allowing for competition in the app space messaging over them and not facing lock in.
I think they're working with the premise that intellectuals are less likely to be as religious or more likely to think for themselves, leading to breaking off
Won't you accomplish the same result by asking questions around the suspected fatal flaw? If it's really a flaw, the suggester is made aware of it. If it isn't a flaw, the asker is given evidence that it's not. It just…
That's a poor option to regulate from. They could just as easily have required messaging apps to make their protocols open, allowing for competition in the app space messaging over them and not facing lock in.
I think they're working with the premise that intellectuals are less likely to be as religious or more likely to think for themselves, leading to breaking off
Won't you accomplish the same result by asking questions around the suspected fatal flaw? If it's really a flaw, the suggester is made aware of it. If it isn't a flaw, the asker is given evidence that it's not. It just…