I like this idea
I couldn't do it. I’m not sure if this is even possible.
I like this concept
I’m not a fan of the chronological approach, but I like this project. It’s beautifully done, I found it interesting to explore
Thanks, now I know what I'm going to read next
I don't think that's the best idea for starting a business. Demand is too low, and the required investment is too high.
I am inclined to agree with the view that AI is merely a tool. And, incidentally, using it rationally isn't always easy.
I don't yet see open models exerting significant pressure on the closed API market. Access to the most significant models is still quite expensive, and demand for them appears to remain high.
I didn't know the ceiling fan market was in such bad shape
Damn, that’s heartbreaking. Rest in peace.
It seems to me that it's like this everywhere now
The idea is interesting, of course, but I think the user experience won't be much different from a classic dating app, plus it inevitably requires an analysis of many nuances
[dead]
I have to agree
Fun game, but I agree with senectus1, it's a bit clunky on desktop
It’s not yet clear how all this will be implemented. But I have plenty of doubts.
Actually, yes, that would be at least interesting
"Nicotine is just caffeine" is too clean given the tumor-promotion evidence. To a large extent, it comes down to the method of delivery: patches are difficult to get hooked on because they do not cause a rapid spike in…
A good project. It’s great that the tasks are generated deterministically, without using AI-generated answers
A fair criticism of the article is that it lists SAML's vulnerabilities but doesn't do the same comparison for OIDC. OIDC has its own problems too: JWT algorithm confusion, none algorithm attacks, missing audience…
Thanks for Axiom, looks useful. Does it already cover the new 27.1 beta APIs?
The claim that the IAU vote was procedurally invalid is interesting
I like this idea
I couldn't do it. I’m not sure if this is even possible.
I like this concept
I’m not a fan of the chronological approach, but I like this project. It’s beautifully done, I found it interesting to explore
Thanks, now I know what I'm going to read next
I don't think that's the best idea for starting a business. Demand is too low, and the required investment is too high.
I am inclined to agree with the view that AI is merely a tool. And, incidentally, using it rationally isn't always easy.
I don't yet see open models exerting significant pressure on the closed API market. Access to the most significant models is still quite expensive, and demand for them appears to remain high.
I didn't know the ceiling fan market was in such bad shape
Damn, that’s heartbreaking. Rest in peace.
It seems to me that it's like this everywhere now
The idea is interesting, of course, but I think the user experience won't be much different from a classic dating app, plus it inevitably requires an analysis of many nuances
[dead]
[dead]
I have to agree
Fun game, but I agree with senectus1, it's a bit clunky on desktop
It’s not yet clear how all this will be implemented. But I have plenty of doubts.
Actually, yes, that would be at least interesting
"Nicotine is just caffeine" is too clean given the tumor-promotion evidence. To a large extent, it comes down to the method of delivery: patches are difficult to get hooked on because they do not cause a rapid spike in…
A good project. It’s great that the tasks are generated deterministically, without using AI-generated answers
A fair criticism of the article is that it lists SAML's vulnerabilities but doesn't do the same comparison for OIDC. OIDC has its own problems too: JWT algorithm confusion, none algorithm attacks, missing audience…
[dead]
Thanks for Axiom, looks useful. Does it already cover the new 27.1 beta APIs?
[dead]
The claim that the IAU vote was procedurally invalid is interesting