[dead]
what a dumb way to redefine winning... if your rival loses more than you means you have won. they act as if with that assumption, but in fact what really happens is everyone loses. it's a lose-lose scenario
the most often overlooked aspect of "the present" is that it has a size or length. so the "present" may be a second, zero seconds (with lots of math), or even 1000 years.
until trees with their wood laid waste to this balance? at least until fungi figured hoe to break lingin?
that whole nanomachines sci fi, e.g. nanobots making grey goo or whatever is not as exciting if you consider cells are alreay microbits made out of protein nanobots
I've found that I have gotten better at this as I've gotten older. it does get easier.
yes, I think it happens so you (we) can go hunting or harvesting or something, I can usually refocus that into cooking
which means it also ends (stops) there the issue comes down to the possibility of programming a mobile smartphone using only mobile smartphones (in contrast with PCs)
I see this as a consequence of the overarching ideology of markets and capitalism standing in the way of humans exploiting the full potential of digital and internet technologies. at this point this is a social problem…
I wouldn't think that 3 months is enough time to decide if success has been reached
what I don't like about this (in general) is that it's part of the overruling ideology that will turn the internet from a place where you can look up how to make any recipe for free into a place where you have pay…
the trick is to cook about one and a half servings everytime. this way you eat one serving, store the half and heat up a previously stored side dish (previously remaining half serving)
> we lose “I am a unique, distinct entity. I agree with this sentiment. quantum mechanics (stemming out of statistics mechanics) start from regarding all particles as indistinguishable. IMO, this theory is more…
[dead]
[dead]
what a dumb way to redefine winning... if your rival loses more than you means you have won. they act as if with that assumption, but in fact what really happens is everyone loses. it's a lose-lose scenario
the most often overlooked aspect of "the present" is that it has a size or length. so the "present" may be a second, zero seconds (with lots of math), or even 1000 years.
until trees with their wood laid waste to this balance? at least until fungi figured hoe to break lingin?
that whole nanomachines sci fi, e.g. nanobots making grey goo or whatever is not as exciting if you consider cells are alreay microbits made out of protein nanobots
I've found that I have gotten better at this as I've gotten older. it does get easier.
yes, I think it happens so you (we) can go hunting or harvesting or something, I can usually refocus that into cooking
which means it also ends (stops) there the issue comes down to the possibility of programming a mobile smartphone using only mobile smartphones (in contrast with PCs)
I see this as a consequence of the overarching ideology of markets and capitalism standing in the way of humans exploiting the full potential of digital and internet technologies. at this point this is a social problem…
I wouldn't think that 3 months is enough time to decide if success has been reached
what I don't like about this (in general) is that it's part of the overruling ideology that will turn the internet from a place where you can look up how to make any recipe for free into a place where you have pay…
the trick is to cook about one and a half servings everytime. this way you eat one serving, store the half and heat up a previously stored side dish (previously remaining half serving)
> we lose “I am a unique, distinct entity. I agree with this sentiment. quantum mechanics (stemming out of statistics mechanics) start from regarding all particles as indistinguishable. IMO, this theory is more…