> My understanding is the software was fine, it was faulty sensors with no redundancy and poor feedback displays to pilots. And who is managing one sensor only or not providing the feedback? The MCAS software
I was not able to find these phone numbers online, where did you get them from?
If the user is anonymous, so as copyright holder, or target of harassment or whatever I can't know who is the creator of the content, it makes perfectly sense for me that you, as host of the content are liable of the…
Yes, but currently content providers are making money (not in case of wikipedia, I know) over content that could be against the law (it could be hate speech, harassment, copyright infringement or whatever). For example…
Making content providers liable about the content they publish seems to me essential to have an healthy internet: I don't understand all the problem about censorship; Am I missing something?
> My understanding is the software was fine, it was faulty sensors with no redundancy and poor feedback displays to pilots. And who is managing one sensor only or not providing the feedback? The MCAS software
I was not able to find these phone numbers online, where did you get them from?
If the user is anonymous, so as copyright holder, or target of harassment or whatever I can't know who is the creator of the content, it makes perfectly sense for me that you, as host of the content are liable of the…
Yes, but currently content providers are making money (not in case of wikipedia, I know) over content that could be against the law (it could be hate speech, harassment, copyright infringement or whatever). For example…
Making content providers liable about the content they publish seems to me essential to have an healthy internet: I don't understand all the problem about censorship; Am I missing something?