You're potentially taking up a hospital bed at some point that could be used for someone else.
> Requiring people to consume a medical product just to live their normal lives is morally wrong. > So your hang up is the FDA giving full approval? Perhaps they will but could you save the strawman arguments for then…
That we know of, just as we "Knew" these vaccines would effectively prevent transmissions and wouldn't have side effects.
I want to be able to date without the risk of HIV, seems we have to abolish gay bars and make homsexuality itself a crime.
Just as they had a good idea that vaccinating would effectively make the virus transmissible, just as they had a good idea about masks working and not working, just as they...
Perhaps it would be better for me to say ostensibly there to build browsers (and other software). In response to the manifesto I'll ask how recent that manifesto and mission statement is? Surely they weren't always a…
> I am not asking the world: I am asking you, an individual human who assuredly stands for something (and hell: we know you at least stand for this, as you decided to stop using Firefox over it ;P). How about standing…
Some in the world are capable of working without being emotionally incapacitated by the thought that those they work with don't agree with all that they believe in. Mozilla is there to build browsers. Politics should…
> I'm sorry, are you dismissing all psychology papers? Following the reproducibility crisis they can't be trusted on face value. When used to promote SJW and progressivist causes they can be almost certainly dismissed.…
Agreed. This is the paragraph that Barrin92 is trying to missrepresent. > Let me be clear: The horror of Mao’s China was singular. I am not making a comparison to the death and destruction it caused or to the severity…
You're right it isn't different, it was a stupid idea with firewalls and it's a stupid idea with chess sets.
Ah yes a progressive claim backed up by psychology papers. A field currently drowning in a reproducibility crisis, and a group who believe that lying and slander is not only okay but should be actively utilised in every…
That's fair; apologies. I'm too late to edit it now but if some passing mods see it and is able to alter please do so.
"showdead" is a must for HN
It's honestly getting creepy at this point. Throughout this entire comment tree starting from its base you have multiple long term HN users all consciously going out of their way to constructs lies in the pursuit of…
Don't get me wrong, you're absolutely right about the tribalism that affects all sides in this situation we're in.
Oh isn't that convenient. The definitely racist memo full of racism has so much in it that it is somehow completely impossible to quote any section at all that contains it. > And beyond that, it's a moot point, because…
Now do we believe the word of a progressive who claims they saw these things given how much lying that crowd has been doing in this very comment section alone.
Well not completely but yes more or less. Look at this comment collection surrounding Damore. The one thing that unifies the group defending the firing is that they are all willing to lie to do so and are doing it in…
> And yes, obviously people read it that way. He was fired because he wouldn't stop arguing about it, remember? Various people keep claiming that but there doesn't appear to be any proof of it. > People acting like…
Any proof of this claim?
Start with these and let me know how you get on. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Looking https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationality https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learning We can advance once you've got the above mastered.
Looks like the wired analysis and your own views can be summarised as "we don't understand everything about psychology", and that "biological differences barely matter, it largely comes down to nurture instead of…
I don't really get what you're arguing? This seems to be just semantics on a 3rd party comment on a forum. > The text preemptively claims that people will reject it because they are too politically correct. The text was…
A claim you have both proof of and a link to the "original" that you will surely provide.
You're potentially taking up a hospital bed at some point that could be used for someone else.
> Requiring people to consume a medical product just to live their normal lives is morally wrong. > So your hang up is the FDA giving full approval? Perhaps they will but could you save the strawman arguments for then…
That we know of, just as we "Knew" these vaccines would effectively prevent transmissions and wouldn't have side effects.
I want to be able to date without the risk of HIV, seems we have to abolish gay bars and make homsexuality itself a crime.
Just as they had a good idea that vaccinating would effectively make the virus transmissible, just as they had a good idea about masks working and not working, just as they...
Perhaps it would be better for me to say ostensibly there to build browsers (and other software). In response to the manifesto I'll ask how recent that manifesto and mission statement is? Surely they weren't always a…
> I am not asking the world: I am asking you, an individual human who assuredly stands for something (and hell: we know you at least stand for this, as you decided to stop using Firefox over it ;P). How about standing…
Some in the world are capable of working without being emotionally incapacitated by the thought that those they work with don't agree with all that they believe in. Mozilla is there to build browsers. Politics should…
> I'm sorry, are you dismissing all psychology papers? Following the reproducibility crisis they can't be trusted on face value. When used to promote SJW and progressivist causes they can be almost certainly dismissed.…
Agreed. This is the paragraph that Barrin92 is trying to missrepresent. > Let me be clear: The horror of Mao’s China was singular. I am not making a comparison to the death and destruction it caused or to the severity…
You're right it isn't different, it was a stupid idea with firewalls and it's a stupid idea with chess sets.
Ah yes a progressive claim backed up by psychology papers. A field currently drowning in a reproducibility crisis, and a group who believe that lying and slander is not only okay but should be actively utilised in every…
That's fair; apologies. I'm too late to edit it now but if some passing mods see it and is able to alter please do so.
"showdead" is a must for HN
It's honestly getting creepy at this point. Throughout this entire comment tree starting from its base you have multiple long term HN users all consciously going out of their way to constructs lies in the pursuit of…
Don't get me wrong, you're absolutely right about the tribalism that affects all sides in this situation we're in.
Oh isn't that convenient. The definitely racist memo full of racism has so much in it that it is somehow completely impossible to quote any section at all that contains it. > And beyond that, it's a moot point, because…
Now do we believe the word of a progressive who claims they saw these things given how much lying that crowd has been doing in this very comment section alone.
Well not completely but yes more or less. Look at this comment collection surrounding Damore. The one thing that unifies the group defending the firing is that they are all willing to lie to do so and are doing it in…
> And yes, obviously people read it that way. He was fired because he wouldn't stop arguing about it, remember? Various people keep claiming that but there doesn't appear to be any proof of it. > People acting like…
Any proof of this claim?
Start with these and let me know how you get on. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Looking https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationality https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learning We can advance once you've got the above mastered.
Looks like the wired analysis and your own views can be summarised as "we don't understand everything about psychology", and that "biological differences barely matter, it largely comes down to nurture instead of…
I don't really get what you're arguing? This seems to be just semantics on a 3rd party comment on a forum. > The text preemptively claims that people will reject it because they are too politically correct. The text was…
A claim you have both proof of and a link to the "original" that you will surely provide.