>Nobody gives a shit about those non-profit organizations that "represent" the decentralized groups. Everybody that's donated to BLM does, as do the community organizers that leverage these groups, and the media and…
>First off it's been over seven years Which was three years after BLM was created. >it's not hard to understand that black lives matter is a decentralized movement that is not centrally represented. There are official…
Opinion articles and FB posts, none of which back up GP's "literally the only substantial voice" claim... So you couldn't find anything, thanks for making my point for me. Again, where is any official BlackLivesMatter…
>Literally the only substantial voice that stood up and went to bat for Daniel Shaver was BLM. I don't believe this is true. Can you like anything on BlackLivesMatter.com that touches on Daniel Shaver's death?
True, but it's been weaponized extremely well by one side in recent years (2012~14 and onwards). Reminds me a lot of how it was weaponized by the other side in the late 80s and 90s.
>See, all you have to do is push people who claim to want an apolitical workspace just a little to get their real views to surface. What "real views"? He laid out a fairly neutral and convincing case for apolitical…
Truly the end of an era. LiveLeak was a trustworthy source to get the unedited, uncensored version of whatever the media was peddling you.
>Nobody gives a shit about those non-profit organizations that "represent" the decentralized groups. Everybody that's donated to BLM does, as do the community organizers that leverage these groups, and the media and…
>First off it's been over seven years Which was three years after BLM was created. >it's not hard to understand that black lives matter is a decentralized movement that is not centrally represented. There are official…
Opinion articles and FB posts, none of which back up GP's "literally the only substantial voice" claim... So you couldn't find anything, thanks for making my point for me. Again, where is any official BlackLivesMatter…
>Literally the only substantial voice that stood up and went to bat for Daniel Shaver was BLM. I don't believe this is true. Can you like anything on BlackLivesMatter.com that touches on Daniel Shaver's death?
True, but it's been weaponized extremely well by one side in recent years (2012~14 and onwards). Reminds me a lot of how it was weaponized by the other side in the late 80s and 90s.
>See, all you have to do is push people who claim to want an apolitical workspace just a little to get their real views to surface. What "real views"? He laid out a fairly neutral and convincing case for apolitical…
Truly the end of an era. LiveLeak was a trustworthy source to get the unedited, uncensored version of whatever the media was peddling you.