i find this arcticle almost completely misleading. just a couple of thoughts: the city "once boasting a population of over 700,000" never saw more than 600,000 people after 1957. it's correct that it lost about 100,000…
i find this arcticle almost completely misleading. just a couple of thoughts: the city "once boasting a population of over 700,000" never saw more than 600,000 people after 1957. it's correct that it lost about 100,000…