> We can PoC the Firecracker VM Escape on that service. Does this mean you ran the exploit on your service and confirmed it worked? If so, why would you be advertising this, lol
There definitely needs to be instructions if on mobile
I think they're saying this is all happening in latent space through pure reasoning.
Can't a phone decode a QR code natively? I don't even get what it does
Without any context for what you're working on, I'd have to assume the reason you don't hit the $20 subscription limit is that you're either not using it very often, or you're working on some relatively boring CRUD app…
People will pay for more intelligent models. Astra and Fable are more intelligent than these open weight models and can solve problems that are much more difficult, and that's extremely valuable. It's not any more…
How do you even write a harness that can use a Claude subscription? I thought it was not allowed by Anthropic's ToS and can get you banned?
What's the `: tmp;` incantation for?
That requires much more thinking (because of calculation) though doesn't it? Which decision models are not optimized for.
Can't the non-deterministic LLM produce deterministic software? Assuming it is not allowed to modify the theorem proving software.
> Using the right abstractions (including the right number of abstractions) and the right data structures and algorithms is always going to trump the constants language choice can optimize. I was with you until this…
Do yourself a favor and look up eBPF - it's incredibly powerful and cool tech. Basically lets you write scripts that run inside the kernel
At least they clarified they are in a yard rather than a lab.
It's the second sentence of the blog post.
Site is broken: "Error establishing a database connection"
What would it mean for codex to "implement LSPs"
errgroup has a SetLimit function to control the max number of concurrent go routines running at once.
> Like who really runs frontier LLMs at `max`? Umm what? Lots of people do
But how else am I supposed to know when we've reached AGI, until I see an absolutely flawless pelican? All of the pelicans so far have had really weird flaws / quirks so I am always a little interested to see how well…
You can also build your own harness for Claude, right? I think that's not against their ToS? Not saying it's ideal, just saying it's an option
This sort of take is so tired and boring, and frankly has zero grounding in reality. "LLMs will never <X>" is constantly being disproven every time they scale up to the next 10X and apply architectural improvements.…
This seems like more competition for Cerebras? Am I understanding correctly?
Obviously the approach you mentioned has the downside of two server round-trips being necessary while the QUERY request only requires a single round-trip. Not to mention the two-request approach adds more complexity to…
Every time you write a test that handles some data, you write an assertion about how much data is handled? Come on, this is such an easy thing to forget to test. Don't act like there is some magical testing strategy…
TL;DR don't have your agent write skills using only its latent knowledge, otherwise you may as well not use a skill in the first place and let it summon that latent knowledge on the fly. Not sure if this take is correct…
> We can PoC the Firecracker VM Escape on that service. Does this mean you ran the exploit on your service and confirmed it worked? If so, why would you be advertising this, lol
There definitely needs to be instructions if on mobile
I think they're saying this is all happening in latent space through pure reasoning.
Can't a phone decode a QR code natively? I don't even get what it does
Without any context for what you're working on, I'd have to assume the reason you don't hit the $20 subscription limit is that you're either not using it very often, or you're working on some relatively boring CRUD app…
People will pay for more intelligent models. Astra and Fable are more intelligent than these open weight models and can solve problems that are much more difficult, and that's extremely valuable. It's not any more…
How do you even write a harness that can use a Claude subscription? I thought it was not allowed by Anthropic's ToS and can get you banned?
What's the `: tmp;` incantation for?
That requires much more thinking (because of calculation) though doesn't it? Which decision models are not optimized for.
Can't the non-deterministic LLM produce deterministic software? Assuming it is not allowed to modify the theorem proving software.
> Using the right abstractions (including the right number of abstractions) and the right data structures and algorithms is always going to trump the constants language choice can optimize. I was with you until this…
Do yourself a favor and look up eBPF - it's incredibly powerful and cool tech. Basically lets you write scripts that run inside the kernel
At least they clarified they are in a yard rather than a lab.
It's the second sentence of the blog post.
Site is broken: "Error establishing a database connection"
What would it mean for codex to "implement LSPs"
errgroup has a SetLimit function to control the max number of concurrent go routines running at once.
> Like who really runs frontier LLMs at `max`? Umm what? Lots of people do
But how else am I supposed to know when we've reached AGI, until I see an absolutely flawless pelican? All of the pelicans so far have had really weird flaws / quirks so I am always a little interested to see how well…
You can also build your own harness for Claude, right? I think that's not against their ToS? Not saying it's ideal, just saying it's an option
This sort of take is so tired and boring, and frankly has zero grounding in reality. "LLMs will never <X>" is constantly being disproven every time they scale up to the next 10X and apply architectural improvements.…
This seems like more competition for Cerebras? Am I understanding correctly?
Obviously the approach you mentioned has the downside of two server round-trips being necessary while the QUERY request only requires a single round-trip. Not to mention the two-request approach adds more complexity to…
Every time you write a test that handles some data, you write an assertion about how much data is handled? Come on, this is such an easy thing to forget to test. Don't act like there is some magical testing strategy…
TL;DR don't have your agent write skills using only its latent knowledge, otherwise you may as well not use a skill in the first place and let it summon that latent knowledge on the fly. Not sure if this take is correct…