> They interpreted existing laws In the dissent at least, the court is very much interpreting court precedent and almost entirely ignoring the law itself
I'm not doing FIRE but this is horrible financial advice, and some things here are simply incorrect. > Even with that consideration, the notion that 37% of people who want to retire early haven’t started the process 37%…
> They interpreted existing laws In the dissent at least, the court is very much interpreting court precedent and almost entirely ignoring the law itself
I'm not doing FIRE but this is horrible financial advice, and some things here are simply incorrect. > Even with that consideration, the notion that 37% of people who want to retire early haven’t started the process 37%…