uh huh. so music is like a joke - the payoff is unexpected, while simultaneously adhering to the brain's expectation of the scenario.
so you're saying the author's personal experience is invalid or otherwise cannot be extrapolated to a wider concept ?
for a forum of programmers i find it remarkably amusing how difficult it seems to discuss classes instead of instantiations
perhaps we could discuss socialization rates in the west over the past few decades, to illuminate the west's social trajectory in the face of technologization? or, perhaps we could talk about the ways that kids behave…
a small wonder the wunderkinds of computer science were at all capable given their lack of computer science degrees
rebelling against the social contract after decades of perceived neglect , a subset of the nerd class uprises and promptly stomps freedom out of existence. thus, a small amount of nerds act to cement the legacy of all…
im legitimately curious why you felt the need to bring up wrongness , of course i could not compel you to answer , still it would be appreciated
putting morality to the side in favor of legal pragmatism , certain jurisdictions classify the act of accessing data without prior authority as data espionage
privacy is a luxury only afforded to the most deserving who clearly are worthy of digital god hood , toil in the mines prole and watch your tongue
personally i think its pretty cool to see that some books from thousands of years ago are applicable to a world the authors could never have imagined. it sure is a lot cooler than detonating earth to make peter thiel…
things now make more sense, thank you for clarifying. in this new light, thiel's vision of transhumanism can be seen as the inverse of catholicism, where both meet at the concept of the soul from diametrically opposed…
kids have more fun with a SNES than they do with a PS5. office runs fine on 2010 era thinkpads. I get by with the cheapest possible nokia. a perceived need for modern tech conveniences is artificially engineered to…
im not sure what gives you the impression that wrongness (or an accusation thereof) was present here. may i ask why you felt the need to ask? personally i think it's interesting to be aware that many AI-isms originate…
openai has retracted many of their lean proofs for the big drop of supposed novel mathematical solns. if frontier ai screws it up , how does this inconsistency manifest in weaker models?
did u have a way to back that belief ?
understanding of the unconscious would be entirely novel , yet such knowledge is overtly claimed here. if the author is human he may be showing signs of ai psycosis.
how does one learn to mitigate not understanding the work they push , given that the work wasnt performed by them ?
contradicting yourself would be a choice on your part , nobody else could choose that for u or lead u there as u put it
ive seen this quote posted many times and never understood it. thanks for linking the original (?) essay, things make sense now. i do disagree with the author though; his statement is plainly defensible.
do you suppose that the average tech worker is socially perceptive enough to determine the occurence of their manipulation? seems to me that most tech workers cease consideration of consequences after accepting their…
thanks for helping understand your perspective , all the best
ok. so if its fairness to protect an outgroup by costing an in group, how would you label protecting both an ingroup and an outgroup ?
ok , so does this imply that the opposite of conservatism is to protect an out group at cost to the in group ?
it sounds like youre saying that protecting a group in the conservative mindset must arise at cost to others , is that right ?
humans are stochastic parrots with more variance
uh huh. so music is like a joke - the payoff is unexpected, while simultaneously adhering to the brain's expectation of the scenario.
so you're saying the author's personal experience is invalid or otherwise cannot be extrapolated to a wider concept ?
for a forum of programmers i find it remarkably amusing how difficult it seems to discuss classes instead of instantiations
perhaps we could discuss socialization rates in the west over the past few decades, to illuminate the west's social trajectory in the face of technologization? or, perhaps we could talk about the ways that kids behave…
a small wonder the wunderkinds of computer science were at all capable given their lack of computer science degrees
rebelling against the social contract after decades of perceived neglect , a subset of the nerd class uprises and promptly stomps freedom out of existence. thus, a small amount of nerds act to cement the legacy of all…
im legitimately curious why you felt the need to bring up wrongness , of course i could not compel you to answer , still it would be appreciated
putting morality to the side in favor of legal pragmatism , certain jurisdictions classify the act of accessing data without prior authority as data espionage
privacy is a luxury only afforded to the most deserving who clearly are worthy of digital god hood , toil in the mines prole and watch your tongue
personally i think its pretty cool to see that some books from thousands of years ago are applicable to a world the authors could never have imagined. it sure is a lot cooler than detonating earth to make peter thiel…
things now make more sense, thank you for clarifying. in this new light, thiel's vision of transhumanism can be seen as the inverse of catholicism, where both meet at the concept of the soul from diametrically opposed…
kids have more fun with a SNES than they do with a PS5. office runs fine on 2010 era thinkpads. I get by with the cheapest possible nokia. a perceived need for modern tech conveniences is artificially engineered to…
im not sure what gives you the impression that wrongness (or an accusation thereof) was present here. may i ask why you felt the need to ask? personally i think it's interesting to be aware that many AI-isms originate…
openai has retracted many of their lean proofs for the big drop of supposed novel mathematical solns. if frontier ai screws it up , how does this inconsistency manifest in weaker models?
did u have a way to back that belief ?
understanding of the unconscious would be entirely novel , yet such knowledge is overtly claimed here. if the author is human he may be showing signs of ai psycosis.
how does one learn to mitigate not understanding the work they push , given that the work wasnt performed by them ?
contradicting yourself would be a choice on your part , nobody else could choose that for u or lead u there as u put it
ive seen this quote posted many times and never understood it. thanks for linking the original (?) essay, things make sense now. i do disagree with the author though; his statement is plainly defensible.
do you suppose that the average tech worker is socially perceptive enough to determine the occurence of their manipulation? seems to me that most tech workers cease consideration of consequences after accepting their…
thanks for helping understand your perspective , all the best
ok. so if its fairness to protect an outgroup by costing an in group, how would you label protecting both an ingroup and an outgroup ?
ok , so does this imply that the opposite of conservatism is to protect an out group at cost to the in group ?
it sounds like youre saying that protecting a group in the conservative mindset must arise at cost to others , is that right ?
humans are stochastic parrots with more variance