Yeah, I'm pretty sure I've bound services to 0.0.0.0 just to avoid the trivial annoyance of checking an IP.
I always kinda wondered when the other shoe was gonna drop on "why do databases even have passwords"...
That's ok, it's not important to my point; it's just weak but confirmatory evidence of my prediction. Still, after 80 years, how are you splitting responsibility for that between our laws and culture and the substance…
On the face, there are dramatic differences between cannabis and cigarette smoke, the most important being that cigarette smoke is highly addictive, the second most important that cigarette smoke has much lower potency.…
Unfortunately since they get paid on IP, it's more like the opposite. A minor revision to replace a proved drug with a re-patentable version is a little work for a lot of money; proving a new use for an out-of-patent…
You can choose alcohol or some other beverage.
So should the meal plan serve alcohol, too, to avoid reacting to 'fears that they're "making a mistake"'?
Yeah, I'm pretty sure I've bound services to 0.0.0.0 just to avoid the trivial annoyance of checking an IP.
I always kinda wondered when the other shoe was gonna drop on "why do databases even have passwords"...
That's ok, it's not important to my point; it's just weak but confirmatory evidence of my prediction. Still, after 80 years, how are you splitting responsibility for that between our laws and culture and the substance…
On the face, there are dramatic differences between cannabis and cigarette smoke, the most important being that cigarette smoke is highly addictive, the second most important that cigarette smoke has much lower potency.…
Unfortunately since they get paid on IP, it's more like the opposite. A minor revision to replace a proved drug with a re-patentable version is a little work for a lot of money; proving a new use for an out-of-patent…
You can choose alcohol or some other beverage.
So should the meal plan serve alcohol, too, to avoid reacting to 'fears that they're "making a mistake"'?