On the other hand, when you do have categories in a language and not the smartest people in the language's community, you do have real problems: You end up with conflicting definitions of homonymic methods because every…
It's my fault, I think I read your answer too quickly and miss a negation somewhere. So, yes, a formal rewriting of Wiles' proof is "only" a practical challenge. But a big one. Just about 15 years ago, we were just able…
No, you're wrong. This is not a theoretical issue there, but a practical one. Almost all mathematics (and this certainly includes Wile's proof) could be written in Coq, in theory. It is extremely hard to do in practice.…
On MacOS, you would distribute a library as a 'Framework' (a package containing the binary shared object, headers, documentation, resources, sub frameworks...). In Xcode, you can quickly add a framework dependency. And…
On the other hand, when you do have categories in a language and not the smartest people in the language's community, you do have real problems: You end up with conflicting definitions of homonymic methods because every…
It's my fault, I think I read your answer too quickly and miss a negation somewhere. So, yes, a formal rewriting of Wiles' proof is "only" a practical challenge. But a big one. Just about 15 years ago, we were just able…
No, you're wrong. This is not a theoretical issue there, but a practical one. Almost all mathematics (and this certainly includes Wile's proof) could be written in Coq, in theory. It is extremely hard to do in practice.…
On MacOS, you would distribute a library as a 'Framework' (a package containing the binary shared object, headers, documentation, resources, sub frameworks...). In Xcode, you can quickly add a framework dependency. And…