More than happy to provided that HN goes back to not being political. Because you're asking people to support something that will literally take families off of food stamps and remove their healthcare.
So you believe that the majority of HN commenters support the Big Beautiful Bill: Adding trillions in unfunded liabilities to the US debt, kicking tens of millions off of Medicaid and food snaps, allowing the Trump…
> if you lobby for a thing which does not do harm to other people The reason this is being discussed now is because of its inclusion in the Big Beautiful Bill which will kill the poorest in society by kicking millions…
And how does this all get paid for ? It doesn't. It massively increases the deficit and debt which in turn will have a raft of knock on consequences for the economy and the reputation of the US.
[flagged]
I assume so it can be included in the Big Beautiful Bill. And if that is the case then shame on everyone who are happy to make themselves wealthier at the expense of the poor. People are literally going to die because…
So is the idea here that the tech community should support the Big Beautiful Bill ? Because that would be just typical.
Apple provides a battery replacement program. And you can use third parties as well which Apple now officially supports. It is just a lie to say you need a new phone.
Do you have some actual evidence that this is the case ? Otherwise saying it is definitively true is misleading to put it mildly.
You can’t judge battery life and performance off a .0 release when the priority is on delivering features with the minimum number of showstopper bugs. At least wait until the .1. It has been like this for every Apple…
Learning requirements of a child are different from an adult. They are fine with a lossy, imperfect version of how the world works.
> practically everyone is better off with a laptop The majority of the world are using their phones as a computing device. And as someone with a MacBook and iPad the later is significantly more ergonomic.
But then you're paying far more than just using Claude web which can be used for tasks other than coding.
a) You still need to code sign on alternative app stores. b) All of your users are still going come through the Apple one.
You would still need to read and summarise the 250k words in order to validate the LLM.
The plural of anecdote is not data. Let's repeat this process for 100 coding examples and see how many it can complete "hands-off" especially where (a) it isn't a case of here is a spec and I need you to implement it…
> If an LLM produces the most interesting, insightful, thought-provoking content of the day, isn't that what the best version of HN would be reading and commenting on? Absolutely not. Would much rather take some that is…
I've had Cursor/Claude try to call rm -rf on my entire User directory before. The issue is that LLMs have no ability to organise their memory by importance. Especially as the context size gets larger. So when they are…
I can't tell any difference between Claude 3.5, 3.7 and 4 for coding. So today is the same AI I used last year. And based on current trajectory same I will use next year.
Learning from LLMs is akin to learning from Joe Rogan. You are getting a stylised view of a topic from an entity who lacks the deep understanding needed to be able to fully distill the information. But it is enough to…
Is there some breakthrough in reasoning between o1 and o3 that we are all missing. And no one cares what we may have in the future. OpenAI etc already have an issue with credibility.
Samy Bengio is the co-author of Torch. His credentials speak for themselves.
> bigger models trained on bigger data with bigger reasoning posttraining and better distillation will push the horizons further and further There is no evidence this is the case. We could be in an era of diminishing…
> aha! I told you they are useless You said this. Neither Apple nor the author did. The focus was specifically on LLM's reasoning capabilities not whether they are entirely useless or not. This is relevant because…
More than happy to provided that HN goes back to not being political. Because you're asking people to support something that will literally take families off of food stamps and remove their healthcare.
So you believe that the majority of HN commenters support the Big Beautiful Bill: Adding trillions in unfunded liabilities to the US debt, kicking tens of millions off of Medicaid and food snaps, allowing the Trump…
> if you lobby for a thing which does not do harm to other people The reason this is being discussed now is because of its inclusion in the Big Beautiful Bill which will kill the poorest in society by kicking millions…
And how does this all get paid for ? It doesn't. It massively increases the deficit and debt which in turn will have a raft of knock on consequences for the economy and the reputation of the US.
[flagged]
[flagged]
I assume so it can be included in the Big Beautiful Bill. And if that is the case then shame on everyone who are happy to make themselves wealthier at the expense of the poor. People are literally going to die because…
So is the idea here that the tech community should support the Big Beautiful Bill ? Because that would be just typical.
Apple provides a battery replacement program. And you can use third parties as well which Apple now officially supports. It is just a lie to say you need a new phone.
Do you have some actual evidence that this is the case ? Otherwise saying it is definitively true is misleading to put it mildly.
You can’t judge battery life and performance off a .0 release when the priority is on delivering features with the minimum number of showstopper bugs. At least wait until the .1. It has been like this for every Apple…
Learning requirements of a child are different from an adult. They are fine with a lossy, imperfect version of how the world works.
> practically everyone is better off with a laptop The majority of the world are using their phones as a computing device. And as someone with a MacBook and iPad the later is significantly more ergonomic.
But then you're paying far more than just using Claude web which can be used for tasks other than coding.
a) You still need to code sign on alternative app stores. b) All of your users are still going come through the Apple one.
You would still need to read and summarise the 250k words in order to validate the LLM.
The plural of anecdote is not data. Let's repeat this process for 100 coding examples and see how many it can complete "hands-off" especially where (a) it isn't a case of here is a spec and I need you to implement it…
> If an LLM produces the most interesting, insightful, thought-provoking content of the day, isn't that what the best version of HN would be reading and commenting on? Absolutely not. Would much rather take some that is…
I've had Cursor/Claude try to call rm -rf on my entire User directory before. The issue is that LLMs have no ability to organise their memory by importance. Especially as the context size gets larger. So when they are…
I can't tell any difference between Claude 3.5, 3.7 and 4 for coding. So today is the same AI I used last year. And based on current trajectory same I will use next year.
Learning from LLMs is akin to learning from Joe Rogan. You are getting a stylised view of a topic from an entity who lacks the deep understanding needed to be able to fully distill the information. But it is enough to…
Is there some breakthrough in reasoning between o1 and o3 that we are all missing. And no one cares what we may have in the future. OpenAI etc already have an issue with credibility.
Samy Bengio is the co-author of Torch. His credentials speak for themselves.
> bigger models trained on bigger data with bigger reasoning posttraining and better distillation will push the horizons further and further There is no evidence this is the case. We could be in an era of diminishing…
> aha! I told you they are useless You said this. Neither Apple nor the author did. The focus was specifically on LLM's reasoning capabilities not whether they are entirely useless or not. This is relevant because…