The consequences can be made equivalent. Reinforcement training.
I think there’s a chance for anti ai terrorism along with Amish style anti ai behavior. Ai is stripping people away from their identity. There’s tons and tons of hatred for it… even here on HN.
Exactly. The LLM is correct. But no one has the balls nor are they unbiased enough to agree.
Sure you can do that. But what’s the practical point if only your agent is reading it? Your agent doesn’t care about linting.
Not useful at all. It uses up context. You need all the context you can get for the LLM read the code later for you later.
>if you're going to be upset at anyone it should not be the reporters. Everyone is just upset by AI. So they want to blame the side that was involved with AI. It's like how cops automatically assume black people are…
This is cool. But of course we have to think of the other use case: "Hack the planet."
Teach him how to use ai.
Nobody is talking about how far we'll go or what the end game will be. That is NOT the topic of the conversation! I'm saying right now in your personal workflow you are giving up many useful features of AI when you only…
> I take this as a stronger signal that too many people with shitty opinions have a microphone these days Look in the mirror.
> Until it doesn’t, and then you’re too stupid to understand why not. Was it that your prompt wasn’t good enough? Does the model not have enough context? Is it even possible for your request to be satisfied? You’re…
What does human stupidity have to do with this? If you're too stupid to ask it a good prompt then you're probably too stupid to design something for it to do. I'm saying ask the AI something beyond your intellectual…
The issue is the LLM can often design thing superior to anything you can do. Now this isn't always the case but it is often the case. By limiting yourself to code only YOU design you are cutting off a major portion of…
[dead]
It's a cheap shot when a woman questions a mans masculinity/courage. It's deliberate and done with malice. It's like someone asking you why are you being a little bitch? Honest question.
Read the last paragraph before posting something redundant.
> Why does legibility bias persist across society, even when we are aware of it? One answer is: it soothes people. This is false on so many levels. First of all illegibility also soothes. Many people prefer the…
But also less energy created by dams means energy is now likely offset by energy generated by greenhouse gases.
Then don’t engage. The fact that you decided to engage to write this is a display of how malicious you are. You engage to hurt people. You don’t engage to learn or to see other view points. Frankly when the topic is…
> That's a ridiculous claim unsupported by any evidence. It’s called following the trendline. We have current rates of population decline and past rates of population decline and we do a projection and we get one of the…
>Maybe it will sound harsh, sorry for that, but I'm going to be real: people like you should be alone, and will be alone, no matter what happens with women rights in the future. If they are not choosing you now, they…
>Yes. No. >get over the idea that our biology is aligned with ethics. This quote is true. See praying mantis example. Plenty of examples where the male or female dies sacrificing itself for the next generation. These…
prompt: "Claude, can you make an article for me for our magazine that declares how we are banning all use of AI for anything we publish. Thanks!"
I don't even know what a manosphere is nor do I care. Most likely it's some incel misogyny insult. Why don't you say something of substance instead of mouthing off with drivel like this.
>Anytime where someone thinks the solution to a problem is taking away choices from another group it's time to be very very suspicious to say the least. Is it? Nature and evolution never gave us the choice for millions…
The consequences can be made equivalent. Reinforcement training.
I think there’s a chance for anti ai terrorism along with Amish style anti ai behavior. Ai is stripping people away from their identity. There’s tons and tons of hatred for it… even here on HN.
Exactly. The LLM is correct. But no one has the balls nor are they unbiased enough to agree.
Sure you can do that. But what’s the practical point if only your agent is reading it? Your agent doesn’t care about linting.
Not useful at all. It uses up context. You need all the context you can get for the LLM read the code later for you later.
>if you're going to be upset at anyone it should not be the reporters. Everyone is just upset by AI. So they want to blame the side that was involved with AI. It's like how cops automatically assume black people are…
This is cool. But of course we have to think of the other use case: "Hack the planet."
Teach him how to use ai.
Nobody is talking about how far we'll go or what the end game will be. That is NOT the topic of the conversation! I'm saying right now in your personal workflow you are giving up many useful features of AI when you only…
> I take this as a stronger signal that too many people with shitty opinions have a microphone these days Look in the mirror.
> Until it doesn’t, and then you’re too stupid to understand why not. Was it that your prompt wasn’t good enough? Does the model not have enough context? Is it even possible for your request to be satisfied? You’re…
What does human stupidity have to do with this? If you're too stupid to ask it a good prompt then you're probably too stupid to design something for it to do. I'm saying ask the AI something beyond your intellectual…
The issue is the LLM can often design thing superior to anything you can do. Now this isn't always the case but it is often the case. By limiting yourself to code only YOU design you are cutting off a major portion of…
[dead]
It's a cheap shot when a woman questions a mans masculinity/courage. It's deliberate and done with malice. It's like someone asking you why are you being a little bitch? Honest question.
Read the last paragraph before posting something redundant.
> Why does legibility bias persist across society, even when we are aware of it? One answer is: it soothes people. This is false on so many levels. First of all illegibility also soothes. Many people prefer the…
But also less energy created by dams means energy is now likely offset by energy generated by greenhouse gases.
Then don’t engage. The fact that you decided to engage to write this is a display of how malicious you are. You engage to hurt people. You don’t engage to learn or to see other view points. Frankly when the topic is…
> That's a ridiculous claim unsupported by any evidence. It’s called following the trendline. We have current rates of population decline and past rates of population decline and we do a projection and we get one of the…
>Maybe it will sound harsh, sorry for that, but I'm going to be real: people like you should be alone, and will be alone, no matter what happens with women rights in the future. If they are not choosing you now, they…
>Yes. No. >get over the idea that our biology is aligned with ethics. This quote is true. See praying mantis example. Plenty of examples where the male or female dies sacrificing itself for the next generation. These…
prompt: "Claude, can you make an article for me for our magazine that declares how we are banning all use of AI for anything we publish. Thanks!"
I don't even know what a manosphere is nor do I care. Most likely it's some incel misogyny insult. Why don't you say something of substance instead of mouthing off with drivel like this.
>Anytime where someone thinks the solution to a problem is taking away choices from another group it's time to be very very suspicious to say the least. Is it? Nature and evolution never gave us the choice for millions…