That sounds horrible and like a recipe for both politically motivated censorship and ineffective moderation. I don't want the government involved in at all.
If that was the case, the law would have no real effect, as pretty much every TOS already says that any content can be removed at the site's discretion.
That inevitably leads to the truth being banned. Nobody, and least of all a government, should be trusted to decide what is the truth.
I don't think moderation can even be compared to government censorship. Moderation leads to more diversity of viewpoints expressed, as different places on the internet moderates in different ways, and almost anyone can…
That sounds horrible and like a recipe for both politically motivated censorship and ineffective moderation. I don't want the government involved in at all.
If that was the case, the law would have no real effect, as pretty much every TOS already says that any content can be removed at the site's discretion.
That inevitably leads to the truth being banned. Nobody, and least of all a government, should be trusted to decide what is the truth.
I don't think moderation can even be compared to government censorship. Moderation leads to more diversity of viewpoints expressed, as different places on the internet moderates in different ways, and almost anyone can…