> Are they optimizing for cost or speed of development? Historically I would agree. There are options now that are both easy to develop in and are blazingly fast (C#, Go, Rust, Kotlin to name a few). The elephant in the…
I really think the `case throws` is brilliant. Next, lets add a `never` type to make this legal. var foo = switch (bar) { case String s -> s, case Number n -> return, };
It's too late for me. I, like Douglas Crockford, am completely done with JavaScript [1]. HTMX, LiveView, WASM, Dart, ClojureScript, Kotlin, ScalaJS, Dioxus -- There are lots of options folks. We don't need to surrender…
Until then there is Nix/Guix and Bazel/Buck.
C++ has major flaws that cannot be rectified without serious breaking changes. With that said, Herb has been experimenting with a new cpp frontend with sane defaults [1]. In my opinion, the world is on standby until…
> Are they optimizing for cost or speed of development? Historically I would agree. There are options now that are both easy to develop in and are blazingly fast (C#, Go, Rust, Kotlin to name a few). The elephant in the…
I really think the `case throws` is brilliant. Next, lets add a `never` type to make this legal. var foo = switch (bar) { case String s -> s, case Number n -> return, };
It's too late for me. I, like Douglas Crockford, am completely done with JavaScript [1]. HTMX, LiveView, WASM, Dart, ClojureScript, Kotlin, ScalaJS, Dioxus -- There are lots of options folks. We don't need to surrender…
Until then there is Nix/Guix and Bazel/Buck.
C++ has major flaws that cannot be rectified without serious breaking changes. With that said, Herb has been experimenting with a new cpp frontend with sane defaults [1]. In my opinion, the world is on standby until…