> Imagine for a moment if FB and Google took all their developers and resources... It's a nice thought exercise, but of course not realistic. FAANGs wouldn't be able to attract or retain the talent if they were purely…
Isn't it a tautology? When you're doxxed, your personal identifiable information was revealed to threat or shame you, so yes, you were explicitly or implicitly threatened. The other part of the form allows you to…
> "...unless I have evidence of explicit or implicit threats." It seems you're misreading the policy. See my comment above [1]. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31210455
> Why is this dependant on receiving threats? It is not. From the form [1]: "...that has POTENTIAL to create significant risks of identity theft, financial fraud, harmful direct contact, or other specific harms..."…
$181M, not B.
> Google needs an entirely separate brand/entity to launch these things. From the very first paragraph: "Google’s Area 120 team, an internal incubator that creates experimental apps and services, has launched Keen..."…
Yeah. Who would think that almost half would share their data with... Samsung.
> If google creates jobs in long island city, they would get the same handout though. Nops [1][2]. [1] http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/12/google-to-invest-usd1... [2]…
(Disclaimer: Googler here) +1. Google gives you a corp phone and computer (even multiple ones, if needed); why the heck you'd want to use your personal devices? Plus using a personal device is strongly discouraged.…
> Imagine for a moment if FB and Google took all their developers and resources... It's a nice thought exercise, but of course not realistic. FAANGs wouldn't be able to attract or retain the talent if they were purely…
Isn't it a tautology? When you're doxxed, your personal identifiable information was revealed to threat or shame you, so yes, you were explicitly or implicitly threatened. The other part of the form allows you to…
> "...unless I have evidence of explicit or implicit threats." It seems you're misreading the policy. See my comment above [1]. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31210455
> Why is this dependant on receiving threats? It is not. From the form [1]: "...that has POTENTIAL to create significant risks of identity theft, financial fraud, harmful direct contact, or other specific harms..."…
$181M, not B.
> Google needs an entirely separate brand/entity to launch these things. From the very first paragraph: "Google’s Area 120 team, an internal incubator that creates experimental apps and services, has launched Keen..."…
Yeah. Who would think that almost half would share their data with... Samsung.
> If google creates jobs in long island city, they would get the same handout though. Nops [1][2]. [1] http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/12/google-to-invest-usd1... [2]…
(Disclaimer: Googler here) +1. Google gives you a corp phone and computer (even multiple ones, if needed); why the heck you'd want to use your personal devices? Plus using a personal device is strongly discouraged.…