Sure, he is technically correct, which is the best kind of correct, if you get off on pedantry. This is also technically correct: let’s assume Apple made $500M in iAd revenue in 2013 (his upper bound); they made about…
Where did you get that information? The original report on that story says “a Recruiter for the ‘Google.com Engineering’ team formerly known as the ‘Site Reliability Engineering’ team” nothing about COO or any other…
By definition, you need more than one entity to agree.
Sure, he is technically correct, which is the best kind of correct, if you get off on pedantry. This is also technically correct: let’s assume Apple made $500M in iAd revenue in 2013 (his upper bound); they made about…
Where did you get that information? The original report on that story says “a Recruiter for the ‘Google.com Engineering’ team formerly known as the ‘Site Reliability Engineering’ team” nothing about COO or any other…
By definition, you need more than one entity to agree.