Well; nobody on this list has made much wealth at all for society, just shareholders—the most contemptible of parasites
What do Tun and Mars have to do with each other?
Sure, why not? The same reasons they succeeded originally will work just as fine now.
> the lines have to clear. Sorry, the lines have to clear what? Surely there must be some kind of constraint on "lines" that they have to overcome.
> It's surprising how many of your comments place you in the US, and not one in Burundi. I'm guessing based on your past comments you're not too consistent on your claims. I am in the US. Umuryango wanjye uri mu…
Ok so what is the point of neurotically obsessing about intelligence? Would it not be more fruitful to emphasize computation?
> Yeah, it only pays pensions, retirement accounts, provides liquidity for new industries, which then grow and provide jobs, and has been demonstrably one of the best inventions for pulling billions out of poverty and…
Ok; what's his reasoning?
> and has been demonstrably one of the best inventions for pulling billions out of poverty Compared to what? The rest of what you said is obvious bullshit
Boy this really shows how little value the market provides
It's not clear that "super intelligence" is a meaningful concept. This presumes that our concept of intelligence can continue to grow beyond human capacity as opposed to asymptotically approaching what humans recognize…
It's not even clear that ASI is a coherent concept.
Is there a commercial model out there now that wasn't trained on stolen data? Let's stop refering to these ghouls as "innovators": they're glorified bootleggers
Why would you blame AI when there are dozens of other crises with far more evident impact already?
That's also a bad look for any company who willingly hands its IP over
> Steal It's competition, buddy. If you don't think we got big the same way you're nuts. And anyone who is trying to kill tesla has my money. Anyway, I don't think there's much worth stealing at the moment. Chinese…
I think the chinese are doing just fine by themselves at this point
Ok, so why did you bring this up in the context of boko haram? Do you think pets.com is trying to make a bomb?!
> Generally when a seller in state X in the US sells to a buyer in a different state Y the consumer protection laws of state Y apply. I've found the person who lives in California lol, no it does not work that way.
And why would americans use regulated AI software when they could just buy it unregulated from china instead? > If the fintech sector can do it, AI can too. Fintech requires turning the number on a screen into something…
> If everyone is using LLMs then nobody has advantage People with more capital will always have an advantage. This is a large part why the american market fails to produce convincing competition.
...because terrorists in western africa are willing to follow american regulations? I hope this is satire.
Only the boutique ones based in America
This is why Russians now attack in teams of just two, down from dozens in 2022.
It's never been particularly difficult to discern how to assemble a bomb, or C4, or napalm, or.... etc. Difficulty in accessibility of violence has never been what protected society. Except, I'm willing to bet, in FBI…
Well; nobody on this list has made much wealth at all for society, just shareholders—the most contemptible of parasites
What do Tun and Mars have to do with each other?
Sure, why not? The same reasons they succeeded originally will work just as fine now.
> the lines have to clear. Sorry, the lines have to clear what? Surely there must be some kind of constraint on "lines" that they have to overcome.
> It's surprising how many of your comments place you in the US, and not one in Burundi. I'm guessing based on your past comments you're not too consistent on your claims. I am in the US. Umuryango wanjye uri mu…
Ok so what is the point of neurotically obsessing about intelligence? Would it not be more fruitful to emphasize computation?
> Yeah, it only pays pensions, retirement accounts, provides liquidity for new industries, which then grow and provide jobs, and has been demonstrably one of the best inventions for pulling billions out of poverty and…
Ok; what's his reasoning?
> and has been demonstrably one of the best inventions for pulling billions out of poverty Compared to what? The rest of what you said is obvious bullshit
Boy this really shows how little value the market provides
It's not clear that "super intelligence" is a meaningful concept. This presumes that our concept of intelligence can continue to grow beyond human capacity as opposed to asymptotically approaching what humans recognize…
It's not even clear that ASI is a coherent concept.
Is there a commercial model out there now that wasn't trained on stolen data? Let's stop refering to these ghouls as "innovators": they're glorified bootleggers
Why would you blame AI when there are dozens of other crises with far more evident impact already?
That's also a bad look for any company who willingly hands its IP over
> Steal It's competition, buddy. If you don't think we got big the same way you're nuts. And anyone who is trying to kill tesla has my money. Anyway, I don't think there's much worth stealing at the moment. Chinese…
I think the chinese are doing just fine by themselves at this point
Ok, so why did you bring this up in the context of boko haram? Do you think pets.com is trying to make a bomb?!
> Generally when a seller in state X in the US sells to a buyer in a different state Y the consumer protection laws of state Y apply. I've found the person who lives in California lol, no it does not work that way.
And why would americans use regulated AI software when they could just buy it unregulated from china instead? > If the fintech sector can do it, AI can too. Fintech requires turning the number on a screen into something…
> If everyone is using LLMs then nobody has advantage People with more capital will always have an advantage. This is a large part why the american market fails to produce convincing competition.
...because terrorists in western africa are willing to follow american regulations? I hope this is satire.
Only the boutique ones based in America
This is why Russians now attack in teams of just two, down from dozens in 2022.
It's never been particularly difficult to discern how to assemble a bomb, or C4, or napalm, or.... etc. Difficulty in accessibility of violence has never been what protected society. Except, I'm willing to bet, in FBI…