> A paper makes it easier than a video. Alas, most traditional scholars don't really bother writing papers (atleast, not in English AFAIK). > Very little in your comment speaks to that claim, nothing in fact, except may…
> This needs a reputable citation. What an anonymous user personally thinks about it is hardly relevant. Fair enough. Here's the interview with Shatavadhani R. Ganesh from where I get my tidbits.…
> That is an odd claim to make because Sanskrit was not a language of day to day speech. This is what many folk in Universities want us to believe, but having seen day-to-day language used and taught, I don't think it…
> A paper makes it easier than a video. Alas, most traditional scholars don't really bother writing papers (atleast, not in English AFAIK). > Very little in your comment speaks to that claim, nothing in fact, except may…
> This needs a reputable citation. What an anonymous user personally thinks about it is hardly relevant. Fair enough. Here's the interview with Shatavadhani R. Ganesh from where I get my tidbits.…
> That is an odd claim to make because Sanskrit was not a language of day to day speech. This is what many folk in Universities want us to believe, but having seen day-to-day language used and taught, I don't think it…