Yglesias’s piece is much better than the Times’, and much better than other takes, but he’s still missing a few things. 1. Scott is worth reading. 2. Sometimes Scott tackles controversial topics and takes positions I…
Yglesias’s piece is much better than the Times’, and much better than other takes, but he’s still missing a few things. 1. Scott is worth reading. 2. Sometimes Scott tackles controversial topics and takes positions I…