>Once again, you're not linking to a source document that explicitly presents evidence. This is the exact document that Rubio is referencing in his press release I linked above. The evidence presented explicitly…
>Given that, I think it's entirely appropriate to also look at the Republican-controlled Senate report that the OP linked, which says it did. Wrong, it said it did not find collision. Here's the summary from the lead on…
It's not a reach, it's factually what happened. Here's the summary from the lead on the US Senate Special Committee on Intelligence: https://www.rubio.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases... “We can say, without…
>Impressive, a throwaway account that uses the very controversial summary that Barr Or use the latest findings from the lead on the Senate Intel report: https://www.rubio.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases...…
>You keep quoting the bits that are talking about the Mueller investigation and not the Senate Committee. Wrong, I am quoting the bits that are taking about the US Senate Special Committee on Intelligence report. >"the…
>Once again, you're not linking to a source document that explicitly presents evidence. This is the exact document that Rubio is referencing in his press release I linked above. The evidence presented explicitly…
>Given that, I think it's entirely appropriate to also look at the Republican-controlled Senate report that the OP linked, which says it did. Wrong, it said it did not find collision. Here's the summary from the lead on…
It's not a reach, it's factually what happened. Here's the summary from the lead on the US Senate Special Committee on Intelligence: https://www.rubio.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases... “We can say, without…
>Impressive, a throwaway account that uses the very controversial summary that Barr Or use the latest findings from the lead on the Senate Intel report: https://www.rubio.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases...…
>You keep quoting the bits that are talking about the Mueller investigation and not the Senate Committee. Wrong, I am quoting the bits that are taking about the US Senate Special Committee on Intelligence report. >"the…