I just somehow didn't expect DHH to be the one driving the stake into Rails' heart.
> I think Neovim's decisions are justfiable in this context. "A computer shall not harm your work or, through inaction, allow your work to come to harm." "A computer shall not waste your time or require you to do more…
You've got it backwards. You've used AI-adjacent jargon to blindly grope towards philosophical issues that have been debated for thousands of years. You may enjoy reading actual philosophy, you might be surprised how…
I just somehow didn't expect DHH to be the one driving the stake into Rails' heart.
> I think Neovim's decisions are justfiable in this context. "A computer shall not harm your work or, through inaction, allow your work to come to harm." "A computer shall not waste your time or require you to do more…
You've got it backwards. You've used AI-adjacent jargon to blindly grope towards philosophical issues that have been debated for thousands of years. You may enjoy reading actual philosophy, you might be surprised how…