IMO technical debt does not discern between different types of software. If you make a mistake (or are not 100% correct) you will need to fix it unless you are willing to provide your customers less than perfect…
I think it's marginally useful to think of low vs high interest debt in terms of technical debt. I can make assumptions that certain areas of software will not change in the future, but that in itself becomes technical…
I don't want to sound overly pessimistic here, but in my personal experience companies from second and third-world seem to have learned expertly how to exploit the "humanity" angle to outsiders while secretly exploiting…
IMO technical debt does not discern between different types of software. If you make a mistake (or are not 100% correct) you will need to fix it unless you are willing to provide your customers less than perfect…
I think it's marginally useful to think of low vs high interest debt in terms of technical debt. I can make assumptions that certain areas of software will not change in the future, but that in itself becomes technical…
I don't want to sound overly pessimistic here, but in my personal experience companies from second and third-world seem to have learned expertly how to exploit the "humanity" angle to outsiders while secretly exploiting…