I submitted a bug to Facebook's whitehat disclosure 3 or 4 months ago. Got no response whatsoever, except an automated response. The bug still exists. The bug allows users to post as though they are other users on the…
You forgot marquee!
Why are you suggesting A/B instead of multi armed bandit approaches?
You're right. That's a bit more reasonable, so back to my 10% change in base rate (1% abs.) but with a 90% power: > power.prop.test(p1=0.1, p2=0.11, power=0.9,sig.level=0.05) Two-sample comparison of proportions power…
Nor me, to collect a 1% change: > power.prop.test(p1=0.1, p2=0.11, power=0.8,sig.level=0.05) Two-sample comparison of proportions power calculation n = 14750.79 p1 = 0.1 p2 = 0.11 sig.level = 0.05 power = 0.8…
I work with a dozen or so people who are involved in this sort of work. I think it is very interesting to see how they rationalize and deal with their moral compass internally. One of the guys is the most caring,…
I submitted a bug to Facebook's whitehat disclosure 3 or 4 months ago. Got no response whatsoever, except an automated response. The bug still exists. The bug allows users to post as though they are other users on the…
You forgot marquee!
Why are you suggesting A/B instead of multi armed bandit approaches?
You're right. That's a bit more reasonable, so back to my 10% change in base rate (1% abs.) but with a 90% power: > power.prop.test(p1=0.1, p2=0.11, power=0.9,sig.level=0.05) Two-sample comparison of proportions power…
Nor me, to collect a 1% change: > power.prop.test(p1=0.1, p2=0.11, power=0.8,sig.level=0.05) Two-sample comparison of proportions power calculation n = 14750.79 p1 = 0.1 p2 = 0.11 sig.level = 0.05 power = 0.8…
I work with a dozen or so people who are involved in this sort of work. I think it is very interesting to see how they rationalize and deal with their moral compass internally. One of the guys is the most caring,…