Haskell doesn't have a reputation of bad pedagogy per se. My only point was what anyone's reaction should be when their personal impression is "bad pedagogy", in any area of software. It means that something is missing.…
I'm sorry, can you give a single example in the arts and sciences of something that has a reputation for "poor pedagogy"? (But is in fact just inherently difficult.) Here are some inherently difficult subjects: quantum…
it's inappropriate to make ad hominem attacks here, please refrain from doing so. I didn't name any shortcomings in Haskell, I gave a general rule of thumb. However, as you yourself demonstrate dramatically, by using an…
If you ever see anything online that has more than, say, half a dozen users, then it is NEVER the case that it suffers from "poor pedagogy". Why? Because it only takes 1 person to explain something, even if it's brief,…
>> Category theory codifies this compositional style into a design pattern, the category. >To the average person, a theory codifying a style into a pattern just isn't useful But you don't mean "the average person", you…
Haskell doesn't have a reputation of bad pedagogy per se. My only point was what anyone's reaction should be when their personal impression is "bad pedagogy", in any area of software. It means that something is missing.…
I'm sorry, can you give a single example in the arts and sciences of something that has a reputation for "poor pedagogy"? (But is in fact just inherently difficult.) Here are some inherently difficult subjects: quantum…
it's inappropriate to make ad hominem attacks here, please refrain from doing so. I didn't name any shortcomings in Haskell, I gave a general rule of thumb. However, as you yourself demonstrate dramatically, by using an…
If you ever see anything online that has more than, say, half a dozen users, then it is NEVER the case that it suffers from "poor pedagogy". Why? Because it only takes 1 person to explain something, even if it's brief,…
>> Category theory codifies this compositional style into a design pattern, the category. >To the average person, a theory codifying a style into a pattern just isn't useful But you don't mean "the average person", you…