> a reason to give up I don't think Sabine is telling us to "give up". Let me give an example. Suppose there is an experiment that is solvable by building a super collider whose diameter is the diameter of the moon.…
You'd also have to put the experimental group there, too.
Before you reach for conclusions you should at least set up a double blind experiment. Set up 8 experiments 4 on and 4 off, have a friend either plug it in (or not) while you're in the other room and see if you can feel…
> but there’s no evidence Wi-Fi, cellphones or anything else radio related is hurting people It seems like an attempt to do an epidemiological study would be highly compromised by everyday use washing out the exposure…
It's not for this particular study, but here is a possible mechanism for RF harm that I've been wondering about for a long time, and it drives me up the wall that people think I'm crazy for mentioning it. I'm also tired…
> a reason to give up I don't think Sabine is telling us to "give up". Let me give an example. Suppose there is an experiment that is solvable by building a super collider whose diameter is the diameter of the moon.…
You'd also have to put the experimental group there, too.
Before you reach for conclusions you should at least set up a double blind experiment. Set up 8 experiments 4 on and 4 off, have a friend either plug it in (or not) while you're in the other room and see if you can feel…
> but there’s no evidence Wi-Fi, cellphones or anything else radio related is hurting people It seems like an attempt to do an epidemiological study would be highly compromised by everyday use washing out the exposure…
It's not for this particular study, but here is a possible mechanism for RF harm that I've been wondering about for a long time, and it drives me up the wall that people think I'm crazy for mentioning it. I'm also tired…