They just need more diversity and SJW initiatives! They spent hundreds of millions on them the past five years, to great effect!
All those hundreds of millions of dollars Intel shelled out over the past five years for SJW and "diversity" initiatives are finally paying off!!!
Welcome to the status quo in the Bay Area. Mentally deranged leftists are having public breakdowns because their usual tactic of calling any slight some kind of -ism is slowly ceasing to work.
"Sexual harassment" is a blanket term for various behaviors that are criminal. Unwarranted touching is sexual assault, sexual messages are illegal harassment, etc. >even if there is a crime involved the police and…
>They are not yet criminals though. They're free to fire, furlough, place on paid leave, etc. >and you still dont get it. And there you go with the IMAX-level projection; it's painfully obvious you have no clue.
>yes it, why do you support people who abuse I don't, and neither should the company, which is why they should call the police. >why should they still be kept in the company if the evidence is credible? Company is free…
Challenging yourself out of your comfort zone is whiteness, and toxic white culture.
>No you dont get it, its not a projection. It's IMAX-level projection. >Some people dont want to deal with police complaint. And if they don't want to, it's not the companies place to babysit and play judge and jury.…
>Apparently you still don't get it. I do. Stop projecting about "not getting it". I fully explained the position, and why your original example falls through. QED.
>No its not. If you ever work in big companies you will know that. This is the logical fallacy "appeal to the majority". Just because most companies do something doesn't necessarily mean it's moral, required, logically…
>Why do you I think I agree with you? "should the company do something or should it not babysit employees?" The company is doing something by not babysitting the employees. Not baby sitting the employees is the only…
You can live an agrarian sustenance lifestyle and society wouldn't collapse... That's what society was for thousands of years. Again, you choose to make a taxable income; you choose to pay taxes.
The company should not babysit the employees, and should call the police. Glad you agree.
>You have to pay taxes. Not really, no. You don't have to make money. You're able to live a life free of income and taxes, live like a vagabond. You choose to earn enough income that you have to pay taxes on it. If you…
I'll add HashiCorp to that list. When we were small, we had #random and other general Slacks where being open and yourself was the norm. Then we grew a little more, the left-wing activist employees started flooding in…
They just need more diversity and SJW initiatives! They spent hundreds of millions on them the past five years, to great effect!
All those hundreds of millions of dollars Intel shelled out over the past five years for SJW and "diversity" initiatives are finally paying off!!!
Welcome to the status quo in the Bay Area. Mentally deranged leftists are having public breakdowns because their usual tactic of calling any slight some kind of -ism is slowly ceasing to work.
"Sexual harassment" is a blanket term for various behaviors that are criminal. Unwarranted touching is sexual assault, sexual messages are illegal harassment, etc. >even if there is a crime involved the police and…
>They are not yet criminals though. They're free to fire, furlough, place on paid leave, etc. >and you still dont get it. And there you go with the IMAX-level projection; it's painfully obvious you have no clue.
>yes it, why do you support people who abuse I don't, and neither should the company, which is why they should call the police. >why should they still be kept in the company if the evidence is credible? Company is free…
Challenging yourself out of your comfort zone is whiteness, and toxic white culture.
>No you dont get it, its not a projection. It's IMAX-level projection. >Some people dont want to deal with police complaint. And if they don't want to, it's not the companies place to babysit and play judge and jury.…
>Apparently you still don't get it. I do. Stop projecting about "not getting it". I fully explained the position, and why your original example falls through. QED.
>No its not. If you ever work in big companies you will know that. This is the logical fallacy "appeal to the majority". Just because most companies do something doesn't necessarily mean it's moral, required, logically…
>Why do you I think I agree with you? "should the company do something or should it not babysit employees?" The company is doing something by not babysitting the employees. Not baby sitting the employees is the only…
You can live an agrarian sustenance lifestyle and society wouldn't collapse... That's what society was for thousands of years. Again, you choose to make a taxable income; you choose to pay taxes.
The company should not babysit the employees, and should call the police. Glad you agree.
>You have to pay taxes. Not really, no. You don't have to make money. You're able to live a life free of income and taxes, live like a vagabond. You choose to earn enough income that you have to pay taxes on it. If you…
I'll add HashiCorp to that list. When we were small, we had #random and other general Slacks where being open and yourself was the norm. Then we grew a little more, the left-wing activist employees started flooding in…