> I still don't understand how or why a non-reference is implicitly consumed by passing it (read-only intention) by value(?) to another function and then can't be used again. By default the value is moved in Rust, just…
> I still don't understand how or why a non-reference is implicitly consumed by passing it (read-only intention) by value(?) to another function and then can't be used again. By default the value is moved in Rust, just…