Are you saying that the cost of doing this is low because of advertisers' experience? Or are you saying that it's ok because we already have a slightly less intrusive version of this in place?
> no one is skeptical of classification any more than the people doing the rating. And perhaps the people being rated.
What happens where these kinds of models are the reason for suicidal thoughts or criminality?
So you're saying we're used to it, now.
But doctors getting massive amounts of training is exactly the kind of problem computer science seeks to solve with a machine learning approach. There aren't enough doctors around to monitor every patient, so machine…
Imagine what that would do to dispel listing a key word list of languages ever touched, if we could just say, I know how to work with loops and functions, or I can compose systems of objects, or I know that a database…
Well, there's language types, if you get into Comparative Programming Languages. There's imperative languages, query languages, object oriented languages, and mixes thereof. Maybe we could call them programming accents.
As a bilingual speaker: For someone ostensibly trying to fight stereotypes around bilingualism, this article sure covers all the stereotypes without doing much to dispel them. But I guess an article stating: Listen up,…
It should read "...Yahoo Chief Executive Marissa Mayer's decision to indulge the directive..." indulge, not obey.
Yup, that's the job!
We haven't moved much from MVC apps, have we?
It's an attempt to justify recklessness. If you know exactly what your machine is going to do, you are responsible for what your machine does. This is why you can have web services. If you don't know exactly what your…
Giving software human rights shields authors from responsibility for the actions of their creations. If I wrote a machine to harass people, I would want my AI to have human rights as well. Then I could claim that it…
Are you saying that the cost of doing this is low because of advertisers' experience? Or are you saying that it's ok because we already have a slightly less intrusive version of this in place?
> no one is skeptical of classification any more than the people doing the rating. And perhaps the people being rated.
What happens where these kinds of models are the reason for suicidal thoughts or criminality?
So you're saying we're used to it, now.
But doctors getting massive amounts of training is exactly the kind of problem computer science seeks to solve with a machine learning approach. There aren't enough doctors around to monitor every patient, so machine…
Imagine what that would do to dispel listing a key word list of languages ever touched, if we could just say, I know how to work with loops and functions, or I can compose systems of objects, or I know that a database…
Well, there's language types, if you get into Comparative Programming Languages. There's imperative languages, query languages, object oriented languages, and mixes thereof. Maybe we could call them programming accents.
As a bilingual speaker: For someone ostensibly trying to fight stereotypes around bilingualism, this article sure covers all the stereotypes without doing much to dispel them. But I guess an article stating: Listen up,…
It should read "...Yahoo Chief Executive Marissa Mayer's decision to indulge the directive..." indulge, not obey.
Yup, that's the job!
We haven't moved much from MVC apps, have we?
It's an attempt to justify recklessness. If you know exactly what your machine is going to do, you are responsible for what your machine does. This is why you can have web services. If you don't know exactly what your…
Giving software human rights shields authors from responsibility for the actions of their creations. If I wrote a machine to harass people, I would want my AI to have human rights as well. Then I could claim that it…