I really disagree with their acceptable usage policy, but you can't say it with certainity that LLM contributions would be a fix for this. They generate so much noise (as the primary incentive behind an independent LLM…
What is this 'mind' you speak of? As everyone else is intellectually lazy, how do you define the transformer architecture under the hood of LLMs?
I recommend you read the authors' other two latest articles.
Funnily enough you really do need a great prompting and SKILLS setup to use antigravity effectively in contrast to other providers which actually started benefiting from less detailed prompts over time. But I like it…
`agy --dangerously-skip-permissions`
FYI, there are ungoogled chromium builds for Android. Firefox Mobile really is a lackluster browser unfortunately both from a usability and security standpoint (e.g. IonStack worked on Fennec)
This is standart, and happens constantly with Invidious (youtube frontend). This happened before on AuroraOSS too. They probably just flagged the accounts and no API change or A/B testing an API change.
We miscommunicated. First, I think LLMs are a problem for newcomers in general, there is a lot of intuition that I saw that you build while tinkering at 3 A.M which makes programming easier in the long run, at least for…
I like that they supplied the prompt instead of the working code :)
Reverse proxies work because they're not behind restrictive NATs, and having a few central servers that are not behind Symmetric NAT is a surefire way to establish an ISP-granted monopoly. Even if that somehow worked,…
This came out a bit longer than I expected. Depends on your usage. A rubber duck won't upheave the entire history of written human knowledge to reach for your answer. It doesn't have inherent bias, and its purpose could…
The original article talks about 'savvy', which is to me an essence of learning. If 'exploration' is looking at walls of code you don't understand but the linter makes them look cool, you don't need LLMs for that.
Yes, using analogies of comparing LLMs to relatively simple tools and on the same plane declaring them the predecessors to AGI (or for some, we have achieved AGI) is a common hypocritical take.
With all due respect, what you're describing doesn't quite spell learning in my opinion. Sure, its better to read the code of an application you envisioned to learn a programming language rather than an unrelated…
Funny thing is, I'm glad we can read this output. I'm afraid advances in models will result in more censored reasoning for the models' benefit as well as anti-distillation efforts.
That last sentence is a straight-up threat.
https://archive.is/eMRTd
If you think HN is anti-AI, you are in deep. There isn't many places on the internet (sans X/Twit which i don't check) that is as AI-positive as HN. Sure, holdouts remain but the frontpage has a 60% constant vibecoded…
Is ARM truly more user-friendly in this regard? And I dont see no genuine alternative than arm64
Probably to avoid manipulation, there is tons of stuff on HN that hopes to make it to the limelight through this forum channel
This is complete dependency on LLM tools all the way from development to usage, and is risky as well as prone to failure
This does anything but put the user in control. I also think that arbitrary new features on established platforms are not in any close future as it already burns many tokens for you to instruct your agent to fork…
lol. Simple case of if you have to ask, you probably shouldn't.
1. It depends on model and tokens spent 2. Models talk the talk but not always walk the walk
Don't play fair in a game others cheat.
I really disagree with their acceptable usage policy, but you can't say it with certainity that LLM contributions would be a fix for this. They generate so much noise (as the primary incentive behind an independent LLM…
What is this 'mind' you speak of? As everyone else is intellectually lazy, how do you define the transformer architecture under the hood of LLMs?
I recommend you read the authors' other two latest articles.
Funnily enough you really do need a great prompting and SKILLS setup to use antigravity effectively in contrast to other providers which actually started benefiting from less detailed prompts over time. But I like it…
`agy --dangerously-skip-permissions`
FYI, there are ungoogled chromium builds for Android. Firefox Mobile really is a lackluster browser unfortunately both from a usability and security standpoint (e.g. IonStack worked on Fennec)
This is standart, and happens constantly with Invidious (youtube frontend). This happened before on AuroraOSS too. They probably just flagged the accounts and no API change or A/B testing an API change.
We miscommunicated. First, I think LLMs are a problem for newcomers in general, there is a lot of intuition that I saw that you build while tinkering at 3 A.M which makes programming easier in the long run, at least for…
I like that they supplied the prompt instead of the working code :)
Reverse proxies work because they're not behind restrictive NATs, and having a few central servers that are not behind Symmetric NAT is a surefire way to establish an ISP-granted monopoly. Even if that somehow worked,…
This came out a bit longer than I expected. Depends on your usage. A rubber duck won't upheave the entire history of written human knowledge to reach for your answer. It doesn't have inherent bias, and its purpose could…
The original article talks about 'savvy', which is to me an essence of learning. If 'exploration' is looking at walls of code you don't understand but the linter makes them look cool, you don't need LLMs for that.
Yes, using analogies of comparing LLMs to relatively simple tools and on the same plane declaring them the predecessors to AGI (or for some, we have achieved AGI) is a common hypocritical take.
With all due respect, what you're describing doesn't quite spell learning in my opinion. Sure, its better to read the code of an application you envisioned to learn a programming language rather than an unrelated…
Funny thing is, I'm glad we can read this output. I'm afraid advances in models will result in more censored reasoning for the models' benefit as well as anti-distillation efforts.
That last sentence is a straight-up threat.
https://archive.is/eMRTd
If you think HN is anti-AI, you are in deep. There isn't many places on the internet (sans X/Twit which i don't check) that is as AI-positive as HN. Sure, holdouts remain but the frontpage has a 60% constant vibecoded…
Is ARM truly more user-friendly in this regard? And I dont see no genuine alternative than arm64
Probably to avoid manipulation, there is tons of stuff on HN that hopes to make it to the limelight through this forum channel
This is complete dependency on LLM tools all the way from development to usage, and is risky as well as prone to failure
This does anything but put the user in control. I also think that arbitrary new features on established platforms are not in any close future as it already burns many tokens for you to instruct your agent to fork…
lol. Simple case of if you have to ask, you probably shouldn't.
1. It depends on model and tokens spent 2. Models talk the talk but not always walk the walk
Don't play fair in a game others cheat.