Just because you haven't seen it hallucinate on these tasks doesn't mean it can't. When I'm deciding what tool to use, my question is "does this need AI?", not "could AI solve this?" There's plenty of cases where its…
I like the timer idea. I do something kinda similar by prompting the user to enter some short random code to continue. I guess the goal for both is to give the user a chance to get out of autopilot, and avoid…
I'm a big fan of using this kind of thing at work. Rather than setting up a web server or packaging something into an installer, I just pop the bundled HTML file on a shared drive. The CDN approach works, but I don't…
I work in MUMPS daily and this is such an odd take to me. It's entirely possible to write very readable and maintainable MUMPS, and I find it fairly pleasant to write. There's lots of poorly written code, sure, but you…
This is really neat, I didn't know the browser would serve a page that had been generated by XSL. Is this just a hack, or is it an intended feature? I notice, for example, that this doesn't include a <!DOCTYPE html> at…
Just because you haven't seen it hallucinate on these tasks doesn't mean it can't. When I'm deciding what tool to use, my question is "does this need AI?", not "could AI solve this?" There's plenty of cases where its…
I like the timer idea. I do something kinda similar by prompting the user to enter some short random code to continue. I guess the goal for both is to give the user a chance to get out of autopilot, and avoid…
I'm a big fan of using this kind of thing at work. Rather than setting up a web server or packaging something into an installer, I just pop the bundled HTML file on a shared drive. The CDN approach works, but I don't…
I work in MUMPS daily and this is such an odd take to me. It's entirely possible to write very readable and maintainable MUMPS, and I find it fairly pleasant to write. There's lots of poorly written code, sure, but you…
This is really neat, I didn't know the browser would serve a page that had been generated by XSL. Is this just a hack, or is it an intended feature? I notice, for example, that this doesn't include a <!DOCTYPE html> at…