> nobody gave much of a fuck I don't at all mind your saying so, but it might be frowned on around here. > Mainstream is not a "moving goalpost fallacy". Why can't you read?
That's a loaded question, in that it's notoriously difficult to measure, and you already know the answer, but here: http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.... Surprised?
I didn't realize factual corrections need to be cleared by a committee that decides which languages matter. ("More mainstream" is a moving goalpost fallacy.)
> the first mainstream imperative scripting language to have these async/await concepts built-in Hi. https://www.dartlang.org/articles/beyond-async/
RFC https://github.com/mockturtl/squint#squint
That's fascinating. I grew up on Sierra logic, and (so?) I take it for granted. Of course I shouldn't eat the pie; I might need it later. The real world follows this rule, too. Economists call it "time preference."…
> nobody gave much of a fuck I don't at all mind your saying so, but it might be frowned on around here. > Mainstream is not a "moving goalpost fallacy". Why can't you read?
That's a loaded question, in that it's notoriously difficult to measure, and you already know the answer, but here: http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.... Surprised?
I didn't realize factual corrections need to be cleared by a committee that decides which languages matter. ("More mainstream" is a moving goalpost fallacy.)
> the first mainstream imperative scripting language to have these async/await concepts built-in Hi. https://www.dartlang.org/articles/beyond-async/
RFC https://github.com/mockturtl/squint#squint
That's fascinating. I grew up on Sierra logic, and (so?) I take it for granted. Of course I shouldn't eat the pie; I might need it later. The real world follows this rule, too. Economists call it "time preference."…