> and I believe it was premeditated So in other words you're just vibing conspiracy theories and will believe whatever makes you feel better. The only example of thin skin I see is the character assassination attempts…
There's literally nothing in that post of substance, other than the fact the Zig community is obsessed with trying to "prove him wrong" or some other such nonsense. Jarred's responses have been composed and civil, while…
> perpetually offended snowflakes This attitude is so precious to me - "Sorry guys, you can't criticize my criticism." > What Bun did here is basically a sabotage of Zig's reputation I don't even have any words for how…
It this a joke? Your example of Jarred starting fights in public is announcing fork then pointing to a thread where he didn't even participate but rather members of the Zig community decided to talk shit?
> have public fights with the language maintainers Can you point to even one such example?
Andrew decided to attack the person rather than ideas and positions. It's not a reflexive revulsion, it's an appropriately sized reaction to a blog post in poor taste. > not having any morals You don't agree with…
What points? All I'm reading is just a collection of emotional ad-hominems.
No they haven't. It's been said time and time again that their teams were struggling with large JS code bases for Bing Maps and O365 web apps.
You seem to lack a basic understanding of what a market is in the context of a monopoly, and you can't argue your way around a bad foundation. > our argument is basically "the law says so". That's the only argument that…
Of course not, but most folks poking at Microsoft are just borrowing their opinion from other people and regurgitating it for karma. I'm happy to shit on MS for bad decisions, but the constant "herp derp EEE" gets tired…
The Supreme Court ruled once on what they consider an aftermarket monopoly against Kodak in the 1990s, but the aftermarket angle on monopolies has been basically abandoned from a legal perspective because it was shaky…
> that market being Playstation games This is arbitrarily narrowing the definition of market as far as possible. Case in point how Apple's App Store was not ruled a monopoly while Google's Play Store was - there are…
None of your examples pass any of the checks for a monopoly unless you twist the definition of "market" to be the narrowest possible. Situational exclusivity is not the same as a monopoly, and these examples don't pass…
There is no legal, economic, or dictionary definition of monopoly that supports your position. The closest example is "aftermarket" (what you call vertical) following the 90's Kodak SC case, which has long since fizzled…
It's amazing how many people throw around the word monopoly without remotely understanding what it means.
Those prices don't need to bake in the training cost, since it was eaten by someone else (whomever trained the open source models). Anthropic et al. need to price in the whole lifecycle.
A web form assumes the input is or can be made structured, or that you have a user that is willing to fill in a form (vs. writing an email). An LLM is great at taking free-form/unstructured content and mapping it nicely…
More than two decades, folks were grumbling about this in the SOA days.
Not to mention it can query across heterogeneous sources, so the same query can use a duckdb table, sqlite, csv, and parquet (including predicate pushdown).
It doesn't matter what Google makes money from, it matters what they pay Mozilla for. And they pay Mozilla exclusively rev share on ads, nothing else.
Without the ads, there would be no payments to Mozilla. It's absolutely 100% unequivocably ad money.
Apparently you don't understand what bankruptcy means. A company can run out of funds and not be able to meet payroll without declaring bankruptcy, they're different things. But by all means keep talking out of your ass.
MySQL has advocated for decades spinning up a replica with the upgraded version, waiting for it to catch up to master before promoting it to the new master. You can do the same thing with Postgres.
No one said anything about bankruptcy, you seem to have made that up for your "argument" or whatever this is. The company didn't have a viable business model and was running out of cash. MSFT right-sized the team for…
The company raised $10M, did two rounds of layoffs totaling a quarter of the company, and was then acquired not long after. Early stage companies like that don't do layoffs unless it's to extend cash runway, but run…
> and I believe it was premeditated So in other words you're just vibing conspiracy theories and will believe whatever makes you feel better. The only example of thin skin I see is the character assassination attempts…
There's literally nothing in that post of substance, other than the fact the Zig community is obsessed with trying to "prove him wrong" or some other such nonsense. Jarred's responses have been composed and civil, while…
> perpetually offended snowflakes This attitude is so precious to me - "Sorry guys, you can't criticize my criticism." > What Bun did here is basically a sabotage of Zig's reputation I don't even have any words for how…
It this a joke? Your example of Jarred starting fights in public is announcing fork then pointing to a thread where he didn't even participate but rather members of the Zig community decided to talk shit?
> have public fights with the language maintainers Can you point to even one such example?
Andrew decided to attack the person rather than ideas and positions. It's not a reflexive revulsion, it's an appropriately sized reaction to a blog post in poor taste. > not having any morals You don't agree with…
What points? All I'm reading is just a collection of emotional ad-hominems.
No they haven't. It's been said time and time again that their teams were struggling with large JS code bases for Bing Maps and O365 web apps.
You seem to lack a basic understanding of what a market is in the context of a monopoly, and you can't argue your way around a bad foundation. > our argument is basically "the law says so". That's the only argument that…
Of course not, but most folks poking at Microsoft are just borrowing their opinion from other people and regurgitating it for karma. I'm happy to shit on MS for bad decisions, but the constant "herp derp EEE" gets tired…
The Supreme Court ruled once on what they consider an aftermarket monopoly against Kodak in the 1990s, but the aftermarket angle on monopolies has been basically abandoned from a legal perspective because it was shaky…
> that market being Playstation games This is arbitrarily narrowing the definition of market as far as possible. Case in point how Apple's App Store was not ruled a monopoly while Google's Play Store was - there are…
None of your examples pass any of the checks for a monopoly unless you twist the definition of "market" to be the narrowest possible. Situational exclusivity is not the same as a monopoly, and these examples don't pass…
There is no legal, economic, or dictionary definition of monopoly that supports your position. The closest example is "aftermarket" (what you call vertical) following the 90's Kodak SC case, which has long since fizzled…
It's amazing how many people throw around the word monopoly without remotely understanding what it means.
Those prices don't need to bake in the training cost, since it was eaten by someone else (whomever trained the open source models). Anthropic et al. need to price in the whole lifecycle.
A web form assumes the input is or can be made structured, or that you have a user that is willing to fill in a form (vs. writing an email). An LLM is great at taking free-form/unstructured content and mapping it nicely…
More than two decades, folks were grumbling about this in the SOA days.
Not to mention it can query across heterogeneous sources, so the same query can use a duckdb table, sqlite, csv, and parquet (including predicate pushdown).
It doesn't matter what Google makes money from, it matters what they pay Mozilla for. And they pay Mozilla exclusively rev share on ads, nothing else.
Without the ads, there would be no payments to Mozilla. It's absolutely 100% unequivocably ad money.
Apparently you don't understand what bankruptcy means. A company can run out of funds and not be able to meet payroll without declaring bankruptcy, they're different things. But by all means keep talking out of your ass.
MySQL has advocated for decades spinning up a replica with the upgraded version, waiting for it to catch up to master before promoting it to the new master. You can do the same thing with Postgres.
No one said anything about bankruptcy, you seem to have made that up for your "argument" or whatever this is. The company didn't have a viable business model and was running out of cash. MSFT right-sized the team for…
The company raised $10M, did two rounds of layoffs totaling a quarter of the company, and was then acquired not long after. Early stage companies like that don't do layoffs unless it's to extend cash runway, but run…